Suppr超能文献

医学伦理学的新路径。

New paths of medical ethics.

作者信息

Covic A

出版信息

Synth Philos. 1997;12(2):559-71.

Abstract

The author of this essay comments on the thematic block "New Medical Ethics," which appeared in the journal Drustvena istrazivanja (23-24, vol. 5, 3-4/1996), and enters upon an extended discussion on the methodological and philosophical aspects of bioethics (also called biomedical ethics and new medical ethics). The essay represents an attempt to explain the origins of the new medical ethics that is arising out of the new medical situation due to scientific-technological progress. The author distinguishes between positive and negative aspects of bioethics and reconstructs (taking into account the suppositions of Peter Singer) the structure of bioethical methods. He defines bioethics--based on the claim that it is necessarily affiliated with philosophy--as a specific, relational and multiperspectival ethics. Such an approach is formulated as an alternative to deductivist conceptions which consider bioethics as a part of applied ethics, but also as an alternative to bioethical trends (casuistry, principles of biomedical ethics, etc.) that do not permit openness to ethical and philosophical theory.

摘要

本文作者对发表于《社会研究》杂志(第5卷第23 - 24期,3 - 4/1996)的“新医学伦理学”主题板块进行了评论,并就生物伦理学(也称为生物医学伦理学和新医学伦理学)的方法论和哲学方面展开了深入讨论。本文试图解释由于科技进步导致新的医学形势而产生的新医学伦理学的起源。作者区分了生物伦理学的积极和消极方面,并(考虑到彼得·辛格的假设)重构了生物伦理方法的结构。他基于生物伦理学必然与哲学相关联这一主张,将生物伦理学定义为一种特定的、关系性的和多视角的伦理学。这种方法被表述为对将生物伦理学视为应用伦理学一部分的演绎主义概念的替代,同时也是对不允许向伦理和哲学理论开放的生物伦理趋势(决疑论、生物医学伦理学原则等)的替代。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验