Gooding Diane C, Tallent Kathleen A, Matts Christie W
Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Feb;114(1):170-5. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.1.170.
The authors hypothesized that at-risk individuals identified on the basis of their Chapman scale scores would be diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders at follow-up. In the present study, the authors interviewed 135 young adults approximately 5 years following their initial assessment. The at-risk groups included high scorers on the Perceptual Aberration and/or Magical Ideation Scales (n=59) and high scorers on the revised Social Anhedonia Scale (n=32). The control participants (n=44) scored below 0.5 SD of the same-sex group means on all the scales. At the follow-up, the groups differed in terms of their likelihood of having a schizophrenia-spectrum diagnosis, Chi2(2)=9.79, p<.01. The at-risk groups reported more frequent and severe psychotic-like experiences relative to the control group. These findings support the predictive validity of the Chapman psychosis-proneness scales and may enhance the power of early detection efforts.
作者们推测,根据查普曼量表得分确定的高危个体在随访时会被诊断为精神分裂症谱系障碍。在本研究中,作者们在初次评估约5年后对135名年轻人进行了访谈。高危组包括在感知偏差和/或神奇观念量表上得分高的人(n = 59)以及在修订后的社交快感缺乏量表上得分高的人(n = 32)。对照组参与者(n = 44)在所有量表上的得分均低于同性组均值的0.5个标准差。在随访时,各组在精神分裂症谱系诊断的可能性方面存在差异,卡方(2)=9.79,p<.01。与对照组相比,高危组报告的类似精神病性体验更频繁、更严重。这些发现支持了查普曼精神病易感性量表的预测效度,并可能增强早期检测工作的效力。