• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共情与分裂型特质:高分裂型特质组与低分裂型特质组人际反应指数的网络比较

Empathy and Schizotypy: A Network Comparison of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index in High and Low Schizotypy Groups.

作者信息

Hammer Lillian A, Karnick Aleksandr, Beals Kendall, Luther Lauren, Bonfils Kelsey A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 18;14(3):245. doi: 10.3390/bs14030245.

DOI:10.3390/bs14030245
PMID:38540548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10968485/
Abstract

Empathy is a multifaceted concept that is vital to effective social functioning; yet, it is impaired in high schizotypy groups. Furthermore, empathy has been found to be a mediator in the relationship between schizotypy and social functioning, highlighting the importance of empathy as a driver in social outcomes. Despite this, the four-factor structure of a widely-used measure of empathy-the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI)-has been found to be psychometrically weak in high schizotypy samples. As such, this study aimed to assess differences in the item-level network of the IRI between high ( = 427) and low schizotypy groups ( = 470). The results reveal that there are significant differences in the structure of these networks, though they evidence similar strengths. Within the high schizotypy group, the network structure was consistent with the four-factor structure of the IRI subscales; items from each subscale clustered together and were distinct from those in the other subscales. By contrast, the low schizotypy group evidenced six clusters that did not mirror the IRI subscales. These results suggest that the item-level structure of the IRI is dependent upon the level of schizotypy of the sample, with the high schizotypy group's network functioning similarly to what would be expected from the original four-factor structure.

摘要

共情是一个多方面的概念,对有效的社会功能至关重要;然而,在高精神分裂症型特质群体中,共情能力受损。此外,共情被发现是精神分裂症型特质与社会功能之间关系的一个中介因素,凸显了共情作为社会结果驱动因素的重要性。尽管如此,一种广泛使用的共情测量工具——人际反应指数(IRI)的四因素结构,在高精神分裂症型特质样本中被发现其心理测量学特性较弱。因此,本研究旨在评估高精神分裂症型特质组(n = 427)和低精神分裂症型特质组(n = 470)之间IRI项目水平网络的差异。结果表明,这些网络的结构存在显著差异,尽管它们的强度相似。在高精神分裂症型特质组中,网络结构与IRI分量表的四因素结构一致;每个分量表的项目聚集在一起,与其他分量表的项目不同。相比之下,低精神分裂症型特质组有六个聚类,并不反映IRI分量表。这些结果表明,IRI的项目水平结构取决于样本的精神分裂症型特质水平,高精神分裂症型特质组的网络功能与原始四因素结构预期的相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58c2/10968485/4328964df84b/behavsci-14-00245-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58c2/10968485/3192c495528c/behavsci-14-00245-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58c2/10968485/edfd4ee06e03/behavsci-14-00245-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58c2/10968485/4328964df84b/behavsci-14-00245-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58c2/10968485/3192c495528c/behavsci-14-00245-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58c2/10968485/edfd4ee06e03/behavsci-14-00245-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58c2/10968485/4328964df84b/behavsci-14-00245-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Empathy and Schizotypy: A Network Comparison of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index in High and Low Schizotypy Groups.共情与分裂型特质:高分裂型特质组与低分裂型特质组人际反应指数的网络比较
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 18;14(3):245. doi: 10.3390/bs14030245.
2
Measuring empathy in groups with high schizotypy: Psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index.测量具有高度分裂型人格特质群体中的同理心:人际反应指数的心理测量评估。
Psychol Assess. 2022 May;34(5):459-466. doi: 10.1037/pas0001111. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
3
Latent factor modeling of four schizotypy dimensions with theory of mind and empathy.基于心理理论和共情的四种分裂型特质维度的潜在因素建模
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 21;9(11):e113853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113853. eCollection 2014.
4
Exploring the links between alexithymia, empathy and schizotypy in college students using network analysis.运用网络分析探究大学生述情障碍、共情与精神分裂症样人格特质之间的联系。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2020 Jul;25(4):245-253. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2020.1749039. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
5
Applying network analysis to investigate the links between dimensional schizotypy and cognitive and affective empathy.运用网络分析研究多维精神分裂症倾向与认知和情感同理心之间的联系。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:313-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.030. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
6
Social functioning impairments in schizotypy when social cognition and neurocognition are not impaired.在社会认知和神经认知未受损时,分裂型人格障碍中的社会功能损害。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2018 Aug 23;14:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2018.07.001. eCollection 2018 Dec.
7
Empathy and Theory of Mind in Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis: Relations With Schizotypy and Executive Function.精神病超高风险人群的共情与心理理论:与精神分裂症型人格及执行功能的关系
Psychiatry Investig. 2021 Nov;18(11):1109-1116. doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0111. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
8
Cognitive fusion and affective isolation: Blurred self-concept and empathy deficits in schizotypy.认知融合与情感隔离:精神分裂症样特质中的自我概念模糊和同理心缺陷。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Jan;271:178-186. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.11.045. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
9
Mediating role of emotion regulation in the relationship between schizotypy and empathy.中介作用的情绪调节在精神分裂症特质和共情之间的关系。
Psych J. 2022 Jun;11(3):335-343. doi: 10.1002/pchj.551. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
10
Cognitive empathy partially mediates the association between negative schizotypy traits and social functioning.认知共情部分中介了负性精神分裂症特质与社会功能之间的关系。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Nov 30;210(1):62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Schizotypy Moderates the Relationship Between Sleep Quality and Social Cognition.分裂型特质调节睡眠质量与社会认知之间的关系。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2024 Mar 1;212(3):133-140. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001744. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
2
Comparing community detection algorithms in psychometric networks: A Monte Carlo simulation.比较心理计量网络中的社区检测算法:一项蒙特卡罗模拟研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):1485-1505. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02106-4. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
3
Toward an integrative model of transdiagnostic risk factors and suicide: A network comparison of psychiatric outpatients.
走向跨诊断风险因素与自杀的综合模型:精神科门诊患者的网络比较
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Oct;154:252-260. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.07.050. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
4
Cognitive and Affective Empathy Relate Differentially to Emotion Regulation.认知共情和情感共情与情绪调节的关系存在差异。
Affect Sci. 2022;3(1):118-134. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00062-w. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
5
Measuring empathy in groups with high schizotypy: Psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index.测量具有高度分裂型人格特质群体中的同理心:人际反应指数的心理测量评估。
Psychol Assess. 2022 May;34(5):459-466. doi: 10.1037/pas0001111. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6
Schizotypy, Lifestyle Behaviors, and Health Indicators in a Young Adult Sample.年轻成人样本中的分裂型人格特质、生活方式行为与健康指标
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Dec 16;11(12):179. doi: 10.3390/bs11120179.
7
Empathy: Assessment Instruments and Psychometric Quality - A Systematic Literature Review With a Meta-Analysis of the Past Ten Years.同理心:评估工具与心理测量质量——一项对过去十年的系统文献综述及荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 24;12:781346. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781346. eCollection 2021.
8
Empathy and Its Relationship With Social Functioning in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis.同理心及其与超高精神病风险个体社交功能的关系。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 11;12:730092. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.730092. eCollection 2021.
9
What is your empathy scale not measuring? The convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of five empathy scales.你的同理心量表没有测量什么?五个同理心量表的聚合、区别和预测有效性。
J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jan 2;162(1):7-25. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1985417. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
10
Network analysis of cognitive deficit in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.精神分裂症谱系障碍患者认知缺陷的网络分析
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2021 Aug 19;26:100213. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2021.100213. eCollection 2021 Dec.