Rosen J K
Audiology. 1979 May-Jun;18(3):238-52. doi: 10.3109/00206097909081526.
From the literature, it is clear that handicap secondary to acquired hearing impairment has received limited research attention, and that the available studies are limited both in their choice of subjects, and in the adequacy of their audiological information. However, despite obvious deviations of these samples from what is known of the incidence and distribution of acquired hearing impairment, the generalisations of the investigators have in most instances been continued without comment or reservation by those citing their results. The implications of this limited viewpoint are discussed.
从文献中可以清楚地看出,后天性听力障碍所致的残疾受到的研究关注有限,而且现有研究在研究对象的选择及其听力学信息的充分性方面都存在局限性。然而,尽管这些样本与已知的后天性听力障碍的发病率和分布情况明显不同,但引用这些研究结果的人在大多数情况下都毫无保留地继续沿用了研究者的结论,没有提出任何评论。本文讨论了这种有限观点的影响。