SSPL90选择程序的比较。

Comparison of SSPL90 selection procedures.

作者信息

Hawkins D B, Ball T L, Beasley H E, Cooper W A

机构信息

Department of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, University of South Carolina, Columbia 29208.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 1992 Jan;3(1):46-50.

PMID:1571585

Abstract

Recommended SSPL90 values were determined at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz for 16 subjects with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing losses using six different selection procedures, including an Upper Limit of Comfortable Listening (ULCL) and threshold-based procedure by Cox (1988), a threshold-based procedure by Seewald and Ross (1988), and loudness discomfort procedures by Berger (1988), McCandless and Lyregaard (1983), and Hawkins et al (1987) and Libby (1985). Statistically significant differences were found among the procedures at 500 and 2000 Hz. Analysis of individual data showed that while some subjects obtained similar recommended SSPL90s across the procedures, others showed dramatically different values.

摘要

使用六种不同的选择程序，为16名患有轻度至中度感音神经性听力损失的受试者在500、1000和2000赫兹频率下确定了推荐的SSPL90值，这些程序包括Cox（1988年）的舒适聆听上限（ULCL）和基于阈值的程序、Seewald和Ross（1988年）的基于阈值的程序，以及Berger（1988年）、McCandless和Lyregaard（1983年）、Hawkins等人（1987年）和Libby（1985年）的响度不适程序。在500和2000赫兹频率下，各程序之间存在统计学上的显著差异。对个体数据的分析表明，虽然一些受试者在不同程序中获得了相似的推荐SSPL90值，但另一些受试者的值则有显著差异。