• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

助听器验配中听阈水平与最舒适响度水平的比较。

Comparison of hearing threshold level and most comfortable loudness level in hearing aid prescription.

作者信息

Berger K W, Hagberg E N, Varavvas D M, Vottero D M

出版信息

Ear Hear. 1982 Jan-Feb;3(1):30-3. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198201000-00006.

DOI:10.1097/00003446-198201000-00006
PMID:7060843
Abstract

In three experiments, the predictability of the hearing aid gain actually used by clients was compared with that predicted by using data based upon hearing threshold level and data based upon most comfortable loudness level. At the frequencies tested, the mean difference between the predicted and obtained gain was smaller when based upon prediction from the hearing threshold level. It is concluded that from the standpoint of predicting user's gain, the hearing threshold level provides greater accuracy than does most comfortable loudness level.

摘要

在三项实验中,将客户实际使用的助听器增益的可预测性与基于听力阈值水平的数据和基于最舒适响度水平的数据所预测的可预测性进行了比较。在所测试的频率上,基于听力阈值水平进行预测时,预测增益与实际获得的增益之间的平均差异较小。得出的结论是,从预测用户增益的角度来看,听力阈值水平比最舒适响度水平提供更高的准确性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of hearing threshold level and most comfortable loudness level in hearing aid prescription.助听器验配中听阈水平与最舒适响度水平的比较。
Ear Hear. 1982 Jan-Feb;3(1):30-3. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198201000-00006.
2
Comparison of three hearing aid prescription procedures.三种助听器验配程序的比较。
Ear Hear. 1980 Jul-Aug;1(4):211-4. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198007000-00006.
3
Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.舒适响度水平:刺激效果、长期可靠性及可预测性。
J Speech Hear Res. 1989 Dec;32(4):816-28.
4
An acoustic reflex technique of establishing hearing aid settings.一种用于确定助听器设置的声反射技术。
J Am Aud Soc. 1979 Sep-Oct;5(2):71-5.
5
Variability of most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels to speech stimuli in the hearing impaired.听力受损者对言语刺激的最舒适和最不舒适响度水平的变异性。
Ear Hear. 1989 Apr;10(2):94-100. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198904000-00003.
6
[Relation between comfortable loudness and maximal speech intelligibility in children with sensorineural hearing loss].[感音神经性听力损失儿童舒适响度与最大言语清晰度之间的关系]
Vestn Otorinolaringol. 1992 May-Jun(3):6-9.
7
Effects of bandwidth and stimulus type on most comfortable loudness levels of hearing-impaired listeners.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1986 Aug;80(2):484-93. doi: 10.1121/1.394044.
8
Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits II: aided loudness measures.
Ear Hear. 2000 Feb;21(1):32-44. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200002000-00007.
9
Sound quality and speech reception for prescribed hearing aid frequency responses.规定的助听器频率响应的音质和言语接受度。
Ear Hear. 1991 Aug;12(4):251-60. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199108000-00004.
10
Loudness perception is influenced by long-term hearing aid use.响度感知受长期使用助听器的影响。
Audiology. 1999 Jul-Aug;38(4):202-5. doi: 10.3109/00206099909073024.