Suppr超能文献

公众舆论与购买行为。

Public opinion and purchasing.

作者信息

Richardson A, Charny M, Hanmer-Lloyd S

机构信息

Bath Health Authority.

出版信息

BMJ. 1992 Mar 14;304(6828):680-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6828.680.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore the use of a questionnaire to obtain representative public opinions on health services. To examine residents' priorities, knowledge, and views on the public's role in decision making.

DESIGN

Self administered postal questionnaire.

POPULATION

Random sample of 1500 residents in Bath District Health Authority, drawn from electoral registers.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Levels of agreement or disagreement with statements provided and degree of importance given to services and aspects of services.

RESULTS

70 questionnaires were returned unopened. Completed questionnaires were returned by 704 (49.2%) of the 1430 remaining residents. Kidney dialysis was thought very important by 559 (87%) respondents and family planning by only 58 (9%). Public priorities did not seem to reflect value for money. Clear information about treatment was rated as very important by 530 (76%) and comfortable waiting areas by 70 (10%). 372 (53%) of respondents said that they would definitely travel to a hospital outside the district to reduce their wait for surgery. Knowledge of the services provided by the authority and the money available to it was poor. 446 (65%) respondents wanted greater public involvement in decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

A postal questionnaire can provide useful information about public priorities and perceptions about the services provided. More information about health services and their costs and benefits should be given to the public to assist greater public participation in decision making.

摘要

目的

探讨使用调查问卷来获取公众对医疗服务的代表性意见。研究居民对医疗服务的优先事项、了解程度以及对公众在决策中所起作用的看法。

设计

自行填写的邮寄调查问卷。

研究对象

从巴斯地区卫生局的选民登记册中随机抽取1500名居民。

主要观察指标

对所提供陈述的同意或不同意程度,以及对各项服务及其不同方面的重视程度。

结果

70份问卷未开封被退回。其余1430名居民中有704人(49.2%)返回了填写完整的问卷。559名(87%)受访者认为肾脏透析非常重要,而只有58名(9%)受访者认为计划生育非常重要。公众的优先事项似乎并未反映出性价比。530名(76%)受访者认为治疗的清晰信息非常重要,70名(10%)受访者认为舒适的候诊区非常重要。372名(53%)受访者表示他们肯定会前往区外的医院以减少手术等待时间。居民对卫生局提供的服务及其可用资金的了解程度较低。446名(65%)受访者希望公众能更多地参与决策。

结论

邮寄调查问卷能够提供有关公众优先事项以及对所提供服务看法的有用信息。应向公众提供更多有关医疗服务及其成本效益的信息,以促进公众更多地参与决策。

相似文献

1
Public opinion and purchasing.
BMJ. 1992 Mar 14;304(6828):680-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6828.680.
3
Health care rationing: the public's debate.
BMJ. 1996 Mar 16;312(7032):670-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7032.670.
5
Deciding how NHS money is spent: a survey of general public and medical views.
Health Expect. 2002 Mar;5(1):47-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00157.x.
6
Consulting the public about health service priorities.
BMJ. 1995 Oct 28;311(7013):1155-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1155.
7
Assessing priorities for allocation of donor liver grafts: survey of public and clinicians.
BMJ. 1998 Jul 18;317(7152):172-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7152.172.
10
Setting priorities: is there a role for citizens' juries?
BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1591-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1591.

引用本文的文献

2
The public's priorities in health services.
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):904-17. doi: 10.1111/hex.12064. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
3
Who should be involved in health care decision making? A qualitative study.
Health Care Anal. 2008 Jun;16(2):114-26. doi: 10.1007/s10728-007-0051-y. Epub 2007 Jun 26.
4
[Study of primary care health needs through family health diagnosis].
Aten Primaria. 2006 Oct 31;38(7):381-6. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(06)70529-7.
5
Citizen deliberation in setting health-care priorities.
Health Expect. 2005 Jun;8(2):172-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00326.x.
8
Health economics in primary care in the UK: containment of drug costs.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Feb;3(2):100-6. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199303020-00003.

本文引用的文献

1
A useless raffle.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1985 Jun;39(2):183-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.39.2.183.
2
The quality of care. How can it be assessed?
JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.260.12.1743.
3
General practitioners' opinions of health services available to their patients.
BMJ. 1991 Apr 27;302(6783):991-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6783.991.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验