Suppr超能文献

改良Rankin量表在多个评估者之间的可靠性:结构化访谈的益处

Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview.

作者信息

Wilson J T Lindsay, Hareendran Asha, Hendry Anne, Potter Jan, Bone Ian, Muir Keith W

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.

出版信息

Stroke. 2005 Apr;36(4):777-81. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000157596.13234.95. Epub 2005 Feb 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is widely used to assess global outcome after stroke. The aim of the study was to examine rater variability in assessing functional outcomes using the conventional mRS, and to investigate whether use of a structured interview (mRS-SI) reduced this variability.

METHODS

Inter-rater agreement was studied among raters from 3 stroke centers. Fifteen raters were recruited who were experienced in stroke care but came from a variety of professional backgrounds. Patients at least 6 months after stroke were first assessed using conventional mRS definitions. After completion of initial mRS assessments, raters underwent training in the use of a structured interview, and patients were re-assessed. In a separate component of the study, intrarater variability was studied using 2 raters who performed repeat assessments using the mRS and the mRS-SI. The design of the latter part of the study also allowed investigation of possible improvement in rater agreement caused by repetition of the assessments. Agreement was measured using the kappa statistic (unweighted and weighted using quadratic weights).

RESULTS

Inter-rater reliability: Pairs of raters assessed a total of 113 patients on the mRS and mRS-SI. For the mRS, overall agreement between raters was 43% (kappa=0.25, kappa(w)=0.71), and for the structured interview overall agreement was 81% (kappa=0.74, kappa(w)=0.91). Agreement between raters was significantly greater on the mRS-SI than the mRS (P<0.001). Intrarater reliability: Repeatability of both the mRS and mRS-SI was excellent (kappa=0.81, kappa(w) > or =0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Although individual raters are consistent in their use of the mRS, inter-rater variability is nonetheless substantial. Rater variability on the mRS is thus particularly problematic for studies involving multiple raters. There was no evidence that improvement in inter-rater agreement occurred simply with repetition of the assessment. Use of a structured interview improves agreement between raters in the assessment of global outcome after stroke.

摘要

背景与目的

改良Rankin量表(mRS)被广泛用于评估卒中后的整体预后。本研究旨在探讨使用传统mRS评估功能预后时评估者之间的变异性,并调查使用结构化访谈(mRS-SI)是否能降低这种变异性。

方法

对来自3个卒中中心的评估者之间的一致性进行研究。招募了15名评估者,他们有卒中护理经验,但来自不同的专业背景。卒中至少6个月后的患者首先使用传统mRS定义进行评估。在完成初始mRS评估后,评估者接受结构化访谈使用培训,然后对患者进行重新评估。在研究的一个单独部分,使用2名评估者研究评估者内部变异性,这2名评估者使用mRS和mRS-SI进行重复评估。研究的后一部分设计还允许调查评估重复是否会导致评估者之间一致性的可能改善。使用kappa统计量(未加权和使用二次权重加权)测量一致性。

结果

评估者间信度:评估者对共113例患者进行了mRS和mRS-SI评估。对于mRS,评估者之间的总体一致性为43%(kappa=0.25,kappa(w)=0.71),对于结构化访谈,总体一致性为81%(kappa=0.74,kappa(w)=0.91)。评估者之间在mRS-SI上的一致性显著高于mRS(P<0.001)。评估者内信度:mRS和mRS-SI的重复性都很好(kappa=0.81,kappa(w)≥0.94)。

结论

尽管个体评估者在使用mRS时是一致的,但评估者之间的变异性仍然很大。因此,对于涉及多个评估者的研究,mRS上的评估者变异性尤其成问题。没有证据表明评估的重复会简单地导致评估者之间一致性的改善。使用结构化访谈可提高评估者在评估卒中后整体预后时的一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验