• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简化改良Rankin量表问卷(e-smRSq)电子应用程序的初步测试。

Initial testing of an electronic application of the simplified modified Rankin Scale questionnaire (e-smRSq).

作者信息

Dutta Dipankar, Foy Chris, Ramadurai Gopinath, Obaid Mudhar, Bruno Askiel

机构信息

Stroke Service, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK.

Gloucestershire Research Support Service, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, UK.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Sep;29(9):105024. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105024. Epub 2020 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105024
PMID:32807439
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

To facilitate modified Rankin scale (mRS) assessments, we developed and tested a smartphone/web application of the simplified mRS questionnaire (e-smRSq). The e-smRSq guides raters towards a final score according to the smRSq algorithm, and offers hints for scoring based on the conventional mRS concepts.

METHODS

Initially, three experienced mRS certified raters prepared 30 vignettes of unstructured stroke patient interviews, and determined consensus reference scores. Using the e-smRSq, 16 raters of varied professional backgrounds without mRS training scored the mRS for 24 randomly selected vignettes. Subsequently, 5 certified and 5 uncertified raters using the e-smRSq scored 23 mRS certification vignettes developed and used in the Strategies to Innovate Emergency Care Clinical Trials Network-Neurological Emergencies Treatment Trials (SIREN-NETT). Cohen's and Fleiss's kappa (κ), weighted kappa (κw), and intra-class correlation (ICC) compared rater scores with reference scores and assessed interrater reliability.

RESULTS

For the 16 initial raters using the e-smRSq with 24 vignettes, the κ (Fleiss) was 0.62 and ICC 0.87 (CI 0.80-0.93). Comparing raters' scores with reference scores, Cohen's κ was 0.68 and κw 0.90. For the 10 subsequent raters using the e-smRSq on SIREN-NETT vignettes, κ (Fleiss) was 0.8 and ICC 0.95 (CI 0.91-0.97). Comparing all 10 raters scores with SIREN-NETT reference scores, Cohen's κ was 0.88 and κw 0.97. There was no significant difference between certified and uncertified raters.

CONCLUSIONS

The e-smRSq appears to have good reproducibility and validity metrics among both certified and non-certified mRS raters, possibly owing to its simplicity. Further testing in stroke patients in warranted.

摘要

引言与目的

为便于改良Rankin量表(mRS)评估,我们开发并测试了简化mRS问卷的智能手机/网络应用程序(电子简化mRS问卷,e-smRSq)。e-smRSq根据简化mRS问卷算法引导评估者得出最终分数,并根据传统mRS概念提供评分提示。

方法

最初,三名经验丰富的mRS认证评估者编写了30份非结构化中风患者访谈的案例,并确定了一致的参考分数。16名不同专业背景且未接受mRS培训的评估者使用e-smRSq对24个随机选择的案例进行mRS评分。随后,5名认证评估者和5名未认证评估者使用e-smRSq对在创新急诊护理临床试验网络-神经急症治疗试验(SIREN-NETT)中开发和使用的23个mRS认证案例进行评分。采用Cohen's和Fleiss's卡方(κ)、加权卡方(κw)和组内相关系数(ICC)将评估者分数与参考分数进行比较,并评估评估者间的可靠性。

结果

对于使用e-smRSq对24个案例进行评分的16名初始评估者,κ(Fleiss)为0.62,ICC为0.87(95%CI 0.80-0.93)。将评估者分数与参考分数进行比较,Cohen's κ为0.68,κw为0.90。对于随后在SIREN-NETT案例中使用e-smRSq的10名评估者,κ(Fleiss)为0.8,ICC为0.95(95%CI 0.91-0.97)。将所有10名评估者的分数与SIREN-NETT参考分数进行比较,Cohen's κ为0.88,κw为0.97。认证评估者和未认证评估者之间无显著差异。

结论

e-smRSq在认证和未认证的mRS评估者中似乎都具有良好的可重复性和效度指标,这可能归因于其简单性。有必要在中风患者中进行进一步测试。

相似文献

1
Initial testing of an electronic application of the simplified modified Rankin Scale questionnaire (e-smRSq).简化改良Rankin量表问卷(e-smRSq)电子应用程序的初步测试。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Sep;29(9):105024. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105024. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
2
The reliability and validity of a novel Chinese version simplified modified Rankin scale questionnaire (2011).一种新型简体中文版改良 Rankin 量表问卷(2011)的信度和效度。
BMC Neurol. 2020 Apr 8;20(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01708-1.
3
Replication and extension of the simplified modified rankin scale in 150 Chinese stroke patients.150 例中国脑卒中患者简化修正 Rankin 量表的复制和扩展。
Eur Neurol. 2012;67(4):206-10. doi: 10.1159/000334849. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
4
Simplified modified rankin scale questionnaire: reproducibility over the telephone and validation with quality of life.简化后的改良 Rankin 量表问卷:电话回访的可重复性和与生活质量的验证。
Stroke. 2011 Aug;42(8):2276-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.613273. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
5
Validation of the simplified modified Rankin scale for stroke trials: Experience from the ENCHANTED alteplase-dose arm.用于卒中试验的简化改良Rankin量表的验证:来自ENCHANTED阿替普酶剂量组的经验
Int J Stroke. 2021 Feb;16(2):222-228. doi: 10.1177/1747493019897858. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
6
Validation of the Simplified Modified Rankin Scale Questionnaire.简化改良Rankin量表问卷的验证
Eur Neurol. 2020;83(5):493-499. doi: 10.1159/000510721. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
7
Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview.改良Rankin量表在多个评估者之间的可靠性:结构化访谈的益处
Stroke. 2005 Apr;36(4):777-81. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000157596.13234.95. Epub 2005 Feb 17.
8
Improving modified Rankin Scale assessment with a simplified questionnaire.使用简化问卷改善改良 Rankin 量表评估。
Stroke. 2010 May;41(5):1048-50. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.571562. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
9
Determining the modified Rankin score after stroke by postal and telephone questionnaires.通过邮寄和电话问卷确定卒中后的改良 Rankin 评分。
Stroke. 2012 Mar;43(3):851-3. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.639708. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
10
Stroke size correlates with functional outcome on the simplified modified Rankin Scale questionnaire.中风体积与简化改良 Rankin 量表问卷的功能结果相关。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Aug;22(6):781-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.03.011. Epub 2012 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The real-life reliability of the modified Rankin scale used in a stroke unit and a rehabilitation ward.在卒中单元和康复病房使用的改良Rankin量表在现实生活中的可靠性。
Postep Psychiatr Neurol. 2025 Mar;34(1):19-25. doi: 10.5114/ppn.2025.149879. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
2
Comparing the properties of traditional and novel approaches to the modified Rankin scale: Systematic review and meta-analysis.比较改良Rankin量表的传统方法与新方法的特性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Oct 30:23969873241293569. doi: 10.1177/23969873241293569.
3
Text Message-Based Assessment of 90-Day Modified Rankin Scale After Stroke.
基于短信的脑卒中 90 天改良 Rankin 量表评估。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 21;13(10):e033301. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033301. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
4
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in patients with COVID-19 infection: is there a link? A systematic review and case report analysis.COVID-19 感染患者的后部可逆性脑病综合征和可逆性脑动脉收缩综合征:两者之间是否存在关联?一项系统评价和病例报告分析。
J Neurol. 2023 Jun;270(6):2826-2852. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11684-4. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
5
Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale in clinical practice of stroke units and rehabilitation wards.改良Rankin量表在卒中单元和康复病房临床实践中的可靠性。
Front Neurol. 2023 Mar 3;14:1064642. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1064642. eCollection 2023.