Hearse D J, Bolli R
Cardiovascular Research, Rayne Institute, St Thomas's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Cardiovasc Res. 1992 Feb;26(2):101-8. doi: 10.1093/cvr/26.2.101.
Although reperfusion is an absolute prerequisite for the survival of ischaemic tissue, it is not necessarily without hazard. Many (but not all) cardiologists are of the opinion that some component of reperfusion may be detrimental and able to inflict injury over and above that attributable to the ischaemia. In this article we define four sequelae of reperfusion which might be designated as "reperfusion injury", we identify possible underlying mechanisms, and consider whether any of these forms of reperfusion injury are of clinical relevance.
尽管再灌注是缺血组织存活的绝对前提,但它并非毫无风险。许多(但并非所有)心脏病专家认为,再灌注的某些成分可能是有害的,并且能够造成超过缺血所致损伤的额外损伤。在本文中,我们定义了再灌注的四种后遗症,可将其称为“再灌注损伤”,我们确定了可能的潜在机制,并考虑这些形式的再灌注损伤是否具有临床相关性。