Ferrari R
Chair of Cardiology, University of Brescia, Italy.
Rev Port Cardiol. 1998 Sep;17(9):667-84.
The term myocardial ischaemia describes a condition which exists when fractional uptake of oxygen in the heart is not sufficient to maintain the rate of cellular oxidation. This leads to extremely complex situations which have been extensively studied in recent years. A large amount of experimental research has been directed to establish the precise sequence of biochemical events leading to myocyte necrosis as such knowledge could lead to rational treatments designed to delay myocardial cell death. At the present time there is no simple answer to the question of what determines cell death and no recovery on reperfusion. Problems arise because: (1) ischaemic damage is not homogeneous and many factors may combine to cause cell death; (2) severity of biochemical changes and development of necrosis are usually associated (both processes being dependent on the duration of the ischaemia) and it is impossible to establish a causal relationship; (3) the inevitability of necrosis can only be assessed by reperfusion of the ischaemic myocardium. Restoration of flow, however, might result in numerous further negative consequences, thus directly influencing the degree of recovery. From the clinical point of view, I have recently learned that there are several potential manifestations and outcomes associated with myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion. Without doubt ventricular dysfunction (either systolic or diastolic) of the ischaemic zone is the most reliable clinical sign of ischaemia, since ECG changes and symptoms are often absent. The ischaemia-induced ventricular dysfunction, at least initially, is reversible, as early reperfusion of the myocardium results in restoration of normal metabolism and contraction. In the ischaemic zone, recovery of contraction might occur instantaneously or, more frequently, with a considerable delay, thus yielding the condition recently recognized as the stunned myocardium. On the other hand, when ischaemia is severe and prolonged, cell death might occur. Reperfusion at this stage is associated with the release of intracellular enzymes, disruption of cell membranes, influx of calcium, persistent reduction of contractility, and eventual necrosis of at least a portion of the tissue. This entity has been called reperfusion damage by those who believe that much of the injury is the consequence of events occurring at the moment of reperfusion rather than as result of changes occurring during the period of ischaemia. The existence of reperfusion damage, however, has been questioned, and it has been argued that, with the exception of the induction of arrhythmias, it is difficult to be certain that reperfusion causes further injury. The existence of such an entity has clinical relevance, as it would imply the possibility of improving recovery with specific interventions applied at the time of reperfusion. In 1985 Rahimtoola described another possible out-come of myocardial ischaemia. He demonstrated that late reperfusion (after months or even years) of an ischaemic area showing ventricular wall-motion abnormalities might restore normal metabolism and function. He was the first to introduce the term hibernating myocardium, referring to ischaemic myocardium in which the myocytes remain viable but in which contraction is chronically depressed. Our data on metabolic changes occurring during ischaemia followed by reperfusion obtained either in the isolated and perfused rabbit hearts or in CAD patients undergoing intracoronary thrombolysis or aortocoronary by-pass grafting will be reviewed.
心肌缺血这一术语描述的是心脏中氧的分数摄取不足以维持细胞氧化速率时所存在的一种状况。这会导致极其复杂的情况,近年来已对此进行了广泛研究。大量实验研究旨在确定导致心肌细胞坏死的生化事件的确切顺序,因为此类知识可能会带来旨在延缓心肌细胞死亡的合理治疗方法。目前,对于是什么决定细胞死亡且再灌注后无法恢复这一问题,尚无简单答案。出现问题的原因如下:(1)缺血损伤并不均匀,许多因素可能共同导致细胞死亡;(2)生化变化的严重程度与坏死的发展通常相关联(这两个过程均取决于缺血的持续时间),且无法建立因果关系;(3)坏死的必然性只能通过对缺血心肌进行再灌注来评估。然而,血流恢复可能会导致许多进一步的负面后果,从而直接影响恢复程度。从临床角度来看,我最近了解到心肌缺血和再灌注存在几种潜在的表现及结果。毫无疑问,缺血区的心室功能障碍(收缩期或舒张期)是缺血最可靠的临床体征,因为心电图变化和症状往往并不存在。缺血诱导的心室功能障碍,至少在最初是可逆的,因为心肌的早期再灌注会导致正常代谢和收缩功能的恢复。在缺血区,收缩功能的恢复可能会立即出现,或者更常见的是会有相当长的延迟,从而产生最近被认定为心肌顿抑的状况。另一方面,当缺血严重且持续时间较长时,可能会发生细胞死亡。在此阶段进行再灌注会伴随着细胞内酶的释放、细胞膜的破坏、钙的内流、收缩力的持续降低以及至少部分组织最终坏死。那些认为大部分损伤是再灌注瞬间发生的事件而非缺血期间发生变化所致的人将这种情况称为再灌注损伤。然而,再灌注损伤的存在受到了质疑,有人认为,除了诱发心律失常外,很难确定再灌注是否会导致进一步损伤。这种情况的存在具有临床相关性,因为这意味着有可能通过在再灌注时应用特定干预措施来改善恢复情况。1985年,拉希姆图拉描述了心肌缺血的另一种可能结果。他证明,对显示心室壁运动异常的缺血区域进行晚期再灌注(数月甚至数年之后)可能会恢复正常代谢和功能。他首次引入了“冬眠心肌”这一术语,指的是心肌细胞仍存活但收缩功能长期受到抑制的缺血心肌。我们将回顾在离体灌注兔心脏中或在接受冠状动脉内溶栓或主动脉冠状动脉搭桥术的冠心病患者中获得的关于缺血后再灌注期间发生的代谢变化的数据。