Suppr超能文献

对员工医疗保险费的补贴与医疗保险市场。

Subsidies to employee health insurance premiums and the health insurance market.

作者信息

Gruber Jonathan, Washington Ebonya

机构信息

Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 50 Memorial Drive, E52-355, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2005 Mar;24(2):253-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.08.004. Epub 2004 Dec 19.

Abstract

One approach to covering the uninsured that is frequently advocated by policy-makers is subsidizing the employee portion of employer-provided health insurance premiums. But, since the vast majority of those offered employer-provided health insurance already take it up, such an approach is only appealing if there is a very high takeup elasticity among those who are offered and uninsured. Moreover, if plan choice decisions are price elastic, then such subsidies can at the same time increase health care costs by inducing selection of more expensive plans. We study an excellent example of such subsidies: the introduction of pre-tax premiums for postal employees in 1994, and then for the remaining federal employees in 2000. We do so using a census of personnel records for all federal employees from 1991 through 2002. We find that there is a very small elasticity of insurance takeup with respect to its after-tax price, and a modest elasticity of plan choice. Our results suggest that the federal government did little to improve insurance coverage, but much to increase health care expenditures, through this policy change.

摘要

政策制定者经常倡导的一种覆盖未参保者的方法是补贴雇主提供的医疗保险保费中员工承担的部分。但是,由于绝大多数获得雇主提供医疗保险的人已经参保,只有在那些获得保险但未参保的人群中参保弹性非常高时,这种方法才具有吸引力。此外,如果计划选择决策对价格有弹性,那么这种补贴同时可能会通过促使人们选择更昂贵的计划而增加医疗成本。我们研究了此类补贴的一个典型例子:1994年为邮政员工引入税前保费,随后在2000年为其余联邦雇员引入。我们利用1991年至2002年所有联邦雇员的人事记录普查来进行研究。我们发现,保险参保率相对于税后价格的弹性非常小,而计划选择的弹性适中。我们的结果表明,通过这一政策变化,联邦政府在改善保险覆盖方面成效甚微,但在增加医疗支出方面作用显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验