Jacob Johanna, Lundin Douglas
Swedish Pharmaceutical Benefits Board, Solna, Sweden.
J Health Econ. 2005 Mar;24(2):407-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.01.004. Epub 2004 Dec 25.
One of the main features of health insurance is moral hazard, as defined by Pauly [Pauly, M.V., 1968. The economics of moral hazard: comment. American Economic Review 58, 531-537), people face incentives for excess utilization of medical care since they do not pay the full marginal cost for provision. To mitigate the moral hazard problem, a coinsurance can be included in the insurance contract. But health insurance is often publicly provided. Having a uniform coinsurance rate determined in a political process is quite different from having different rates varying in accordance with one's preferences, as is possible with private insurance. We construct a political economy model in order to characterize the political equilibrium and answer questions like: "Under what conditions is there a conflict in society on what coinsurance rate should be set?" and "Which groups of individuals will vote for a higher and lower than equilibrium coinsurance rate, respectively?". We also extend our basic model and allow people to supplement the coverage provided by the government with private insurance. Then, we answer two questions: "Who will buy the additional coverage?" and "How do the coinsurance rates people are now faced with compare with the rates chosen with pure private provision?".
健康保险的主要特征之一是道德风险,正如保利所定义的那样[保利,M.V.,1968年。道德风险的经济学:评论。《美国经济评论》58,531 - 537],由于人们不为医疗服务的全部边际成本买单,所以他们面临过度使用医疗服务的激励。为了减轻道德风险问题,保险合同中可以包含共保条款。但健康保险通常是由公共部门提供的。在政治过程中确定统一的共保率与根据个人偏好设定不同的共保率有很大不同,而私人保险则可以做到这一点。我们构建了一个政治经济模型,以描述政治均衡并回答诸如“在什么情况下社会对于应该设定何种共保率存在冲突?”以及“哪些个体群体将分别投票支持高于和低于均衡共保率的情况?”等问题。我们还扩展了我们的基本模型,允许人们用私人保险来补充政府提供的保险范围。然后,我们回答两个问题:“谁会购买额外的保险?”以及“人们现在面临的共保率与纯粹私人保险提供时所选择的共保率相比如何?”