Jensen Steen Lund, Olsen Bo Sanderhoff, Tyrdal Stein, Søjbjerg Jens Ole, Sneppen Otto
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;14(1):78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.05.009.
The objectives of this experimental study were to investigate the effect of radial head excision and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) division on elbow joint laxity and to determine the efficacy of radial head prosthetic replacement and LCL repair. Valgus, varus, internal rotation, and external rotation of the ulna were measured during passive flexion-extension and application of a 0.75-Nm torque in 6 intact cadaveric elbows and after (1) either excision of the radial head or division of the LCL, (2) removal of both constraints, (3) isolated radial head prosthetic replacement, (4) isolated LCL repair, and (5) radial head replacement combined with LCL repair. Isolated radial head excision increased varus (mean, 4.8 degrees) and external rotatory laxity (mean, 7.1 degrees), as did isolated LCL division (mean, 14.1 degrees for varus; mean, 14.7 degrees for external rotation). After removal of both constraints, varus and external rotatory laxities were increased by 19.0 degrees and 20.1 degrees, respectively, compared with the intact specimens. Isolated radial head replacement reduced mean varus laxity to 14.6 degrees and mean external rotatory laxity to 14.8 degrees. Isolated LCL repair normalized varus laxity but resulted in a 2.9 degrees increase in external rotatory laxity. The combined procedures restored laxity completely. The radial head is a constraint to varus and external rotation in the elbow joint, functioning by maintaining tension in the LCL. Still, removal of both constraints induces severe laxity, and in this case, prosthetic replacement may substitute for the constraining capacity of the native radial head. The combination of LCL repair and radial head replacement restores laxity completely, but an isolated LCL repair performs almost as well, probably by compensating for the ligamentous tension lost from radial head excision.
本实验研究的目的是探讨桡骨头切除和外侧副韧带(LCL)切断对肘关节松弛度的影响,并确定桡骨头假体置换和LCL修复的疗效。在6个完整的尸体肘关节中,以及在(1)桡骨头切除或LCL切断后、(2)去除两种限制因素后、(3)单纯桡骨头假体置换后、(4)单纯LCL修复后、(5)桡骨头置换联合LCL修复后,在被动屈伸和施加0.75 N·m扭矩时测量尺骨的外翻、内翻、内旋和外旋。单纯桡骨头切除增加了内翻(平均4.8度)和外旋松弛度(平均7.1度),单纯LCL切断也有同样效果(内翻平均14.1度;外旋平均14.7度)。去除两种限制因素后,与完整标本相比,内翻和外旋松弛度分别增加了19.0度和20.1度。单纯桡骨头置换将平均内翻松弛度降低至14.6度,平均外旋松弛度降低至14.8度。单纯LCL修复使内翻松弛度恢复正常,但导致外旋松弛度增加2.9度。联合手术完全恢复了松弛度。桡骨头是肘关节内翻和外旋的一个限制因素,通过维持LCL的张力发挥作用。然而,去除两种限制因素会导致严重的松弛,在这种情况下,假体置换可能替代天然桡骨头的限制能力。LCL修复和桡骨头置换联合可完全恢复松弛度,但单纯LCL修复的效果也几乎相同,可能是通过补偿桡骨头切除导致的韧带张力丧失。