Suppr超能文献

创伤复苏的差异及其对患者预后的影响。

Variation in trauma resuscitation and its effect on patient outcome.

作者信息

Driscoll P A, Vincent C A

机构信息

University Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Hope Hospital, Salford, UK.

出版信息

Injury. 1992;23(2):111-5. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(92)90044-s.

Abstract

There were significant differences in the time taken to resuscitate 257 trauma patients from four internationally recognized trauma centres. The fastest unit completed resuscitation in 15 min while the slowest took 105 min. This variation was not explained by differences in the type of patient dealt with, seniority of the team leader, or the number of personnel in the trauma team. Although there were significant differences between the units with regard to these parameters, they did not account for the resuscitation time variations. The average post-qualification time of the team leader at the fastest unit was 2 years. Although the slowest unit had the smallest trauma team (two people), larger numbers of personnel did not shorten resuscitation times. The time taken to carry out the ABC of the primary survey was significantly correlated with patient's physiological change in the resuscitation room (R = -0.63, P less than 0.0001 with systolic blood pressure; R = -0.68, P less than 0.01 with the revised trauma score). A multiple regression with survival as the dependent variable revealed that this time was also a predictor of the patient's eventual outcome (t = 3.18, P less than 0.005).

摘要

来自四个国际知名创伤中心的257名创伤患者的复苏时间存在显著差异。最快的团队在15分钟内完成了复苏,而最慢的团队则花费了105分钟。这种差异无法用所处理患者的类型、团队负责人的资历或创伤团队的人员数量差异来解释。尽管在这些参数方面各团队之间存在显著差异,但它们并不能解释复苏时间的变化。最快团队的团队负责人平均资格后时间为2年。尽管最慢的团队创伤团队最小(两人),但人员数量增加并未缩短复苏时间。在复苏室进行初级评估ABC的时间与患者的生理变化显著相关(收缩压:R = -0.63,P < 0.0001;修订创伤评分:R = -0.68,P < 0.01)。以生存为因变量的多元回归显示,这段时间也是患者最终结局的一个预测指标(t = 3.18,P < 0.005)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验