Driscoll P A, Vincent C A
University Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Hope Hospital, Salford, UK.
Injury. 1992;23(2):111-5. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(92)90044-s.
There were significant differences in the time taken to resuscitate 257 trauma patients from four internationally recognized trauma centres. The fastest unit completed resuscitation in 15 min while the slowest took 105 min. This variation was not explained by differences in the type of patient dealt with, seniority of the team leader, or the number of personnel in the trauma team. Although there were significant differences between the units with regard to these parameters, they did not account for the resuscitation time variations. The average post-qualification time of the team leader at the fastest unit was 2 years. Although the slowest unit had the smallest trauma team (two people), larger numbers of personnel did not shorten resuscitation times. The time taken to carry out the ABC of the primary survey was significantly correlated with patient's physiological change in the resuscitation room (R = -0.63, P less than 0.0001 with systolic blood pressure; R = -0.68, P less than 0.01 with the revised trauma score). A multiple regression with survival as the dependent variable revealed that this time was also a predictor of the patient's eventual outcome (t = 3.18, P less than 0.005).
来自四个国际知名创伤中心的257名创伤患者的复苏时间存在显著差异。最快的团队在15分钟内完成了复苏,而最慢的团队则花费了105分钟。这种差异无法用所处理患者的类型、团队负责人的资历或创伤团队的人员数量差异来解释。尽管在这些参数方面各团队之间存在显著差异,但它们并不能解释复苏时间的变化。最快团队的团队负责人平均资格后时间为2年。尽管最慢的团队创伤团队最小(两人),但人员数量增加并未缩短复苏时间。在复苏室进行初级评估ABC的时间与患者的生理变化显著相关(收缩压:R = -0.63,P < 0.0001;修订创伤评分:R = -0.68,P < 0.01)。以生存为因变量的多元回归显示,这段时间也是患者最终结局的一个预测指标(t = 3.18,P < 0.005)。