Tan Timothy Xin Zhong, Quek Nathaniel Xin Ern, Koh Zhi Xiong, Nadkarni Nivedita, Singaram Kanageswari, Ho Andrew Fu Wah, Ong Marcus Eng Hock, Wong Ting Hway
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
PLoS One. 2016 May 2;11(5):e0154595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154595. eCollection 2016.
For trauma patients, delays to assessment, resuscitation, and definitive care affect outcomes. We studied the effects of resuscitation area occupancy and trauma team size on trauma team resuscitation speed in an observational study at a tertiary academic institution in Singapore.
From January 2014 to January 2015, resuscitation videos of trauma team activated patients with an Injury Severity Score of 9 or more were extracted for review within 14 days by independent reviewers. Exclusion criteria were patients dead on arrival, inter-hospital transfers, and up-triaged patients. Data captured included manpower availability (trauma team size and resuscitation area occupancy), assessment (airway, breathing, circulation, logroll), interventions (vascular access, imaging), and process-of-care time intervals (time to assessment/intervention/adjuncts, time to imaging, and total time in the emergency department). Clinical data were obtained by chart review and from the trauma registry.
Videos of 70 patients were reviewed over a 13-month period. The median time spent in the emergency department was 154.9 minutes (IQR 130.7-207.5) and the median resuscitation team size was 7, with larger team sizes correlating with faster process-of-care time intervals: time to airway assessment (p = 0.08) and time to disposition (p = 0.04). The mean resuscitation area occupancy rate (RAOR) was 1.89±2.49, and the RAOR was positively correlated with time spent in the emergency department (p = 0.009).
Our results suggest that adequate staffing for trauma teams and resuscitation room occupancy are correlated with faster trauma resuscitation and reduced time spent in the emergency department.
对于创伤患者,评估、复苏及确定性治疗的延迟会影响治疗结果。我们在新加坡一所三级学术机构进行了一项观察性研究,探讨复苏区域占用情况和创伤团队规模对创伤团队复苏速度的影响。
2014年1月至2015年1月,由独立评审员在14天内提取创伤团队启动的损伤严重程度评分9分及以上患者的复苏视频进行审查。排除标准为到达时已死亡的患者、院间转运患者及被上调分诊的患者。收集的数据包括人力可用性(创伤团队规模和复苏区域占用情况)、评估(气道、呼吸、循环、翻身)、干预措施(血管通路、影像学检查)以及护理过程时间间隔(评估/干预/辅助措施的时间、影像学检查时间及在急诊科的总时间)。临床数据通过病历审查和创伤登记处获取。
在13个月的时间里,对70例患者的视频进行了审查。在急诊科的中位停留时间为154.9分钟(四分位间距130.7 - 207.5),复苏团队的中位规模为7人,团队规模越大,护理过程时间间隔越快:气道评估时间(p = \alpha)和处置时间(p = \alpha)。复苏区域平均占用率(RAOR)为1.89±2.49,RAOR与在急诊科停留的时间呈正相关(p = \alpha)。
我们的结果表明,创伤团队充足的人员配备和复苏室占用情况与更快的创伤复苏及在急诊科停留时间的缩短相关。