Burkholder Joann M, Gordon Andrew S, Moeller Peter D, Law J Mac, Coyne Kathryn J, Lewitus Alan J, Ramsdell John S, Marshall Harold G, Deamer Nora J, Cary S Craig, Kempton Jason W, Morton Steven L, Rublee Parke A
Center for Applied Aquatic Ecology and College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA. joann_burkholder.ncsu.edu
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 1;102(9):3471-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500168102. Epub 2005 Feb 22.
Toxicity and its detection in the dinoflagellate fish predators Pfiesteria piscicida and Pfiesteria shumwayae depend on the strain and the use of reliable assays. Two assays, standardized fish bioassays (SFBs) with juvenile fish and fish microassays (FMAs) with larval fish, were compared for their utility to detect toxic Pfiesteria. The comparison included strains with confirmed toxicity, negative controls (noninducible Pfiesteria strains and a related nontoxic cryptoperidiniopsoid dinoflagellate), and P. shumwayae strain CCMP2089, which previously had been reported as nontoxic. SFBs, standardized by using toxic Pfiesteria (coupled with tests confirming Pfiesteria toxin) and conditions conducive to toxicity expression, reliably detected actively toxic Pfiesteria, but FMAs did not. Pfiesteria toxin was found in fish- and algae-fed clonal Pfiesteria cultures, including CCMP2089, but not in controls. In contrast, noninducible Pfiesteria and cryptoperidiniopsoids caused no juvenile fish mortality in SFBs even at high densities, and low larval fish mortality by physical attack in FMAs. Filtrate from toxic strains of Pfiesteria spp. in bacteria-free media was cytotoxic. Toxicity was enhanced by bacteria and other prey, especially live fish. Purified Pfiesteria toxin extract adversely affected mammalian cells as well as fish, and it caused fish death at environmentally relevant cell densities. These data show the importance of testing multiple strains when assessing the potential for toxicity at the genus or species level, using appropriate culturing techniques and assays.
在双鞭毛藻鱼类捕食者杀鱼费氏藻(Pfiesteria piscicida)和舒姆维费氏藻(Pfiesteria shumwayae)中,毒性及其检测取决于菌株以及可靠检测方法的使用。比较了两种检测方法,即使用幼鱼的标准化鱼类生物检测法(SFBs)和使用幼体鱼的鱼类微量检测法(FMAs)检测有毒费氏藻的效用。比较包括已确认有毒性的菌株、阴性对照(不可诱导的费氏藻菌株和一种相关的无毒隐多甲藻目双鞭毛藻)以及之前被报道为无毒的舒姆维费氏藻菌株CCMP2089。通过使用有毒费氏藻(并结合确认费氏藻毒素的测试)和有利于毒性表达的条件进行标准化的SFBs,能够可靠地检测出具有活性毒性的费氏藻,但FMAs则不能。在以鱼类和藻类为食的克隆费氏藻培养物中发现了费氏藻毒素,包括CCMP2089,但在对照中未发现。相比之下,不可诱导的费氏藻和隐多甲藻目双鞭毛藻即使在高密度时,在SFBs中也不会导致幼鱼死亡,而在FMAs中通过物理攻击只会导致低水平的幼体鱼死亡。来自费氏藻属有毒菌株在无细菌培养基中的滤液具有细胞毒性。细菌和其他猎物,尤其是活鱼,会增强毒性。纯化的费氏藻毒素提取物对哺乳动物细胞以及鱼类都有不利影响,并且在与环境相关的细胞密度下会导致鱼类死亡。这些数据表明,在使用适当的培养技术和检测方法评估属或种水平的毒性潜力时,测试多个菌株的重要性。