Jones R N, Erwin M E, Gooding B B
Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242.
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Apr;30(4):1022-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.4.1022-1023.1992.
Preliminary interpretive zone diameter criteria were calculated for the 5-micrograms cefdinir disk diffusion test by using two potential MIC breakpoints (less than or equal to 0.5 and less than or equal to 1 micrograms/ml). The absolute agreement between tests ranged from 85.9 to 92.4%, and the false-susceptibility errors were principally contributed by the Enterobacter spp. (2.2% error). One proposed criterion was greater than or equal to 20-mm zone diameter (less than or equal to 1 micrograms/ml) for susceptibility and less than or equal to 16-mm zone diameter (greater than 2 micrograms/ml) for resistance to cefdinir. Clinical laboratory users of the disk diffusion method should be cautioned about the possibility of very major interpretive errors among enterobacter isolates.
通过使用两个潜在的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)断点(小于或等于0.5微克/毫升和小于或等于1微克/毫升),计算了5微克头孢地尼纸片扩散试验的初步解释性抑菌圈直径标准。试验之间的绝对一致性范围为85.9%至92.4%,假敏感错误主要由肠杆菌属引起(误差为2.2%)。一个提议的标准是,对于头孢地尼敏感,抑菌圈直径大于或等于20毫米(小于或等于1微克/毫升),对于耐药,抑菌圈直径小于或等于16毫米(大于2微克/毫升)。应提醒纸片扩散法的临床实验室使用者注意肠杆菌分离株中可能存在非常严重的解释性错误。