Suppr超能文献

头孢地尼与头孢克洛治疗社区获得性肺炎的比较。

Comparison of cefdinir and cefaclor in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Drehobl M, Bianchi P, Keyserling C H, Tack K J, Griffin T J

机构信息

Centre for Health Care, San Diego, California, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Jul;41(7):1579-83. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.7.1579.

Abstract

Six hundred ninety patients were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing the efficacy and safety of cefdinir with those of cefaclor in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Patients received either 10 days of treatment with cefdinir (n = 347) at 300 mg twice daily or 10 days of treatment with cefaclor (n = 343) at 500 mg three times daily. Microbiological assessments were performed on sputum specimens obtained at admission and at the two posttherapy visits, if available. Respiratory tract pathogens were isolated from 538 (78%) of 690 patient admission sputum specimens, with the predominant pathogens being Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus. The microbiological eradication rates at the test-of-cure visit were 92% (238 of 260 pathogens) and 93% (245 of 264 pathogens) for the evaluable patients treated with cefdinir and cefaclor, respectively. A satisfactory clinical response (cure plus improvement) was achieved in 89% (166 of 187) and 86% (160 of 186) of the evaluable patients treated with cefdinir and cefaclor, respectively. Except for the incidence of diarrhea, adverse event rates while on treatment were equivalent between the two treatment groups. Diarrhea incidence during therapy was higher for patients treated with cefdinir (13.7%) than for patients treated with cefaclor (5.3%). These results indicate that cefdinir is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with pneumonia.

摘要

690名患者参与了一项多中心、随机、双盲试验,比较头孢地尼与头孢克洛治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性。患者接受为期10天的治疗,其中347名患者每日两次服用300mg头孢地尼,343名患者每日三次服用500mg头孢克洛。如有可能,在入院时及治疗后两次随访时采集痰标本进行微生物学评估。从690例患者入院时的痰标本中分离出呼吸道病原体538例(78%),主要病原体为副流感嗜血杆菌、流感嗜血杆菌、肺炎链球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌。在可评估的患者中,治疗结束时头孢地尼组和头孢克洛组的微生物清除率分别为92%(260种病原体中的238种)和93%(264种病原体中的245种)。接受头孢地尼和头孢克洛治疗的可评估患者中,分别有89%(187例中的166例)和86%(186例中的160例)获得了满意的临床反应(治愈加改善)。除腹泻发生率外,两个治疗组治疗期间的不良事件发生率相当。头孢地尼治疗患者的腹泻发生率(13.7%)高于头孢克洛治疗患者(5.3%)。这些结果表明,头孢地尼治疗肺炎患者有效且安全。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎
Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Apr;18(4):501-13; quiz 514-5. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.4.501.
7
Community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎
N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 14;333(24):1618-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512143332408.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验