• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症门诊患者罗夏墨迹测验中异常言语表达的稳定性

Stability of unusual verbalizations on the Rorschach for outpatients with schizophrenia.

作者信息

Adair H E, Wagner E E

机构信息

University of Akron.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1992 Mar;48(2):250-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199203)48:2<250::aid-jclp2270480218>3.0.co;2-p.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(199203)48:2<250::aid-jclp2270480218>3.0.co;2-p
PMID:1573029
Abstract

Rorschach protocols of 50 outpatients with schizophrenia who had been tested twice with an average interval of 6.4 years between administrations were scored blind by graduate students trained to detect Unusual Verbalizations (UVs). Scoring reliabilities were excellent and ranged from .93 to .99 for the WSUM6. There were no significant differences between mean group UV scores obtained at the first testing (T1) and the second testing (T2), which attests to the persistence of thought disorder in schizophrenia. The correlations between T1 and T2 testings were, however, modest at best. Deviant Verbalizations, the least pathological of the UV categories, showed the highest test-retest relationship at .50. Tentative explanations for these findings were advanced.

摘要

对50名精神分裂症门诊患者的罗夏墨迹测验记录进行了盲态评分,这些患者接受了两次测试,两次测试之间的平均间隔为6.4年,由接受过检测异常言语(UVs)培训的研究生进行评分。评分信度极佳,WSUM6的信度范围为0.93至0.99。首次测试(T1)和第二次测试(T2)获得的平均组UV分数之间没有显著差异,这证明了精神分裂症思维障碍的持续性。然而,T1和T2测试之间的相关性充其量只是中等。异常言语是UV类别中病理性最低的,其重测关系最高,为0.50。对这些发现提出了初步解释。

相似文献

1
Stability of unusual verbalizations on the Rorschach for outpatients with schizophrenia.精神分裂症门诊患者罗夏墨迹测验中异常言语表达的稳定性
J Clin Psychol. 1992 Mar;48(2):250-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199203)48:2<250::aid-jclp2270480218>3.0.co;2-p.
2
A taxonomy of Rorschach autisms with implications for differential diagnosis among thinking-disordered patients.罗夏墨迹测验自闭症分类法及其对思维障碍患者鉴别诊断的启示
J Clin Psychol. 1995 Mar;51(2):290-3. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199503)51:2<290::aid-jclp2270510220>3.0.co;2-7.
3
On the assessment of thought disorder from the Rorschach.关于从罗夏测验评估思维紊乱
Psychol Rep. 1994 Aug;75(1 Pt 2):375-83. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1994.75.1.375.
4
The schizophrenia spectrum: a study of the relationship among the Rorschach, MMPI, and visual backward masking.精神分裂症谱系:关于罗夏墨迹测验、明尼苏达多项人格测验及视觉倒向掩蔽之间关系的一项研究
J Clin Psychol. 1984 Nov;40(6):1288-94. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198411)40:6<1288::aid-jclp2270400602>3.0.co;2-f.
5
The Rorschach: facts, fictions, and future.罗夏墨迹测验:事实、虚构与未来。
Psychol Assess. 2001 Dec;13(4):452-71.
6
Loss of reality contact on the Rorschach: a formal analysis.罗夏测验中与现实接触的丧失:一项形式分析。
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Apr;78(2):553-4. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.78.2.553.
7
Differential patterns of responding among three groups of chronic, psychotic, forensic outpatients.三组慢性精神病性法医门诊患者的不同反应模式。
J Clin Psychol. 1999 Dec;55(12):1553-65. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199912)55:12<1553::aid-jclp12>3.0.co;2-1.
8
The Exner Rorschach: an analysis of its clinical validity.艾克纳罗夏测验:对其临床效度的分析。
J Clin Psychol. 1991 Jul;47(4):596-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199107)47:4<596::aid-jclp2270470420>3.0.co;2-8.
9
Visual form perception: a comparison of individuals at high risk for psychosis, recent onset schizophrenia and chronic schizophrenia.视觉形式感知:精神病高风险个体、近期起病的精神分裂症患者及慢性精神分裂症患者的比较
Schizophr Res. 2007 Dec;97(1-3):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.08.022. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
10
Manic indices on the Rorschach.罗夏墨迹测验中的躁狂指标。
J Pers Assess. 1997 Oct;69(2):365-75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6902_8.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting Rorschach test and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-II patterns in Kraepelinian vs. DSM-wise Schizophrenia: How They Differ and What It Means for Diagnosis.重新审视克氏与 DSM 精神分裂症中罗夏测验和明尼苏达多相人格测验-II 模式的差异:它们有何不同,对诊断意味着什么。
Sci Prog. 2024 Jul-Sep;107(3):368504241266366. doi: 10.1177/00368504241266366.