Vincent K R, Harman M J
Houston Community College.
J Clin Psychol. 1991 Jul;47(4):596-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199107)47:4<596::aid-jclp2270470420>3.0.co;2-8.
Data from Exner's 1985 and 1989 normative samples on nonpatient adults and comparison samples of patients with schizophrenia, depression, and character problems were reanalyzed using a standard of clinical significance appropriate for N = 1. The 1989 norms, which exclude Rorschach protocols with less than 14 responses, alter not only the number of significant variables, but also alter the ability of most variables that relate to form quality to differentiate among the patient comparison groups. The Exner Rorschach is judged to be a valid test for schizophrenia, but to have demonstrated little differential utility for depression and character disorders. It is recommended that the scoring of nonsignificant variables be abandoned.
对来自埃克斯纳1985年和1989年关于非患者成年人的常模样本以及精神分裂症、抑郁症和性格问题患者的对照样本的数据，使用适用于N = 1的临床显著性标准进行了重新分析。1989年的常模排除了反应少于14次的罗夏墨迹测验记录，这不仅改变了显著变量的数量，还改变了大多数与图形质量相关变量在患者对照组之间进行区分的能力。埃克斯纳罗夏墨迹测验被判定为对精神分裂症是有效的测试，但对抑郁症和性格障碍几乎没有显示出差异效用。建议放弃对非显著变量的计分。
