• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparative drug effects and abuse liability of lorazepam, buspirone, and secobarbital in nondependent subjects.

作者信息

Sellers E M, Schneiderman J F, Romach M K, Kaplan H L, Somer G R

机构信息

Clinical Psychopharmacology Program, Addiction Research Foundation, University of Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1992 Apr;12(2):79-85.

PMID:1573044
Abstract

The pharmacologic effects of lorazepam (2 mg), buspirone (20 mg, 10 mg), secobarbital (100 mg), and placebo were compared in 15 male, experienced, intermittent nontherapeutic drug users. All drugs produced a "drug effect," however, buspirone 20 mg was significantly less liked than were lorazepam, secobarbital, or buspirone 10 mg (p less than .05) but not placebo. Lorazepam was liked better than were other drugs only at 1 hour and only compared with buspirone 20 and placebo. Compared with other drugs, lorazepam drug effects were greater and resulted in more prolonged impairment of a motor tracking task, standing steadiness, and memory. Buspirone 20 mg significantly impaired memory at 1 hour compared with placebo. Subjects were more likely to identify buspirone as unfamiliar. Because buspirone 20 mg was less liked than were other drugs, dose escalation as part of drug abuse is not likely to occur. Lorazepam also was not particularly liked and was not different from placebo on most subjective abuse-relevant measures.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparative drug effects and abuse liability of lorazepam, buspirone, and secobarbital in nondependent subjects.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1992 Apr;12(2):79-85.
2
Subjective and behavioral effects of diphenhydramine, lorazepam and methocarbamol: evaluation of abuse liability.苯海拉明、劳拉西泮和甲氯芬那酯的主观及行为效应:滥用可能性评估
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992 Aug;262(2):707-20.
3
Buspirone and lorazepam abuse liability in humans: behavioral effects, subjective effects and choice.丁螺环酮和劳拉西泮对人类的滥用可能性:行为效应、主观效应及选择
Behav Pharmacol. 1993 Jun;4(3):217-230.
4
Sedation and memory: studies with a histamine H-1 receptor antagonist.镇静与记忆:组胺H-1受体拮抗剂的研究
J Psychopharmacol. 2006 Jul;20(4):506-17. doi: 10.1177/0269881106059804. Epub 2006 Jan 9.
5
Assessment of the abuse liability of buspirone in recreational sedative users.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1982 Dec;43(12 Pt 2):69-75.
6
Behavioral and subjective effects of buspirone and lorazepam in sedative abusers: supra-therapeutic doses.丁螺环酮和劳拉西泮对镇静剂滥用者的行为及主观影响:超治疗剂量
NIDA Res Monogr. 1990;105:318.
7
Evaluation of the abuse potential of methocarbamol.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1989 Mar;248(3):1146-57.
8
Lorazepam and meprobamate dose effects in humans: behavioral effects and abuse liability.劳拉西泮和甲丙氨酯对人类的剂量效应:行为效应和滥用可能性
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987 Dec;243(3):978-88.
9
Therapeutic effects and effects on actual driving performance of chronically administered buspirone and diazepam in anxious outpatients.长期服用丁螺环酮和地西泮对焦虑门诊患者的治疗效果及对实际驾驶性能的影响。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1992 Apr;12(2):86-95.
10
Ramelteon: a novel hypnotic lacking abuse liability and sedative adverse effects.雷美替胺:一种新型催眠药,无滥用倾向且无镇静副作用。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;63(10):1149-57. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.10.1149.

引用本文的文献

1
The anxiolytic CRF(1) antagonist DMP696 fails to function as a discriminative stimulus and does not substitute for chlordiazepoxide in rats.抗焦虑促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子(CRF)(1)拮抗剂DMP696不能作为辨别刺激起作用,且在大鼠中不能替代氯氮卓。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 Apr;166(4):408-15. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1331-8. Epub 2003 Feb 18.
2
Preference for diazepam, but not buspirone, in moderate drinkers.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Jan;123(2):154-63. doi: 10.1007/BF02246172.
3
Discriminative stimulus effects of diazepam and buspirone in normal volunteers.地西泮和丁螺环酮对正常志愿者的辨别刺激效应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 May;63(3):277-94. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-277.