• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

警戒色:我们的出发点应该是什么?

Aposematism: what should our starting point be?

作者信息

Speed Michael P, Ruxton Graeme D

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 22;272(1561):431-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2968.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2004.2968
PMID:15734698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1634992/
Abstract

The evolution of aposematism is considered to be a major evolutionary problem because if new aposematic forms emerged in defended cryptic populations, they would face the dual problems of rarity and conspicuousness. We argue that this commonly assumed starting point might not have wide validity. We describe a novel evolutionary computer model in which prey evolve secondary defences and become conspicuous by moving widely over a visually heterogeneous habitat. Unless crypsis imposes high opportunity costs (for instance, preventing prey from efficient foraging, thermoregulation and communication), costly secondary defences are not predicted to evolve at all. However, when crypsis imposes opportunity costs, prey evolve secondary defences that facilitate raised behavioural conspicuousness as prey exploit opportunities within their environment. Optimal levels of secondary defence and of behavioural conspicuousness increase with population sizes and the costs imposed by crypsis. When prey are already conspicuous by virtue of their behaviours, the evolution of aposematic appearances (bright coloration, etc.) is much easier to explain because aposematic traits add little further costs of conspicuousness, but can bring large benefits.

摘要

警戒色的进化被认为是一个主要的进化问题,因为如果新的警戒色形式出现在具有防御能力的隐蔽种群中,它们将面临稀有性和显眼性这两个双重问题。我们认为,这种通常假定的起点可能没有广泛的有效性。我们描述了一种新颖的进化计算机模型,在该模型中,猎物进化出二级防御,并通过在视觉上异质的栖息地中广泛移动而变得显眼。除非隐蔽带来高昂的机会成本(例如,阻止猎物进行高效觅食、体温调节和交流),否则预计根本不会进化出代价高昂的二级防御。然而,当隐蔽带来机会成本时,猎物会进化出二级防御,随着猎物在其环境中利用机会,这种防御会促进行为显眼性的提高。二级防御和行为显眼性的最佳水平会随着种群规模以及隐蔽所带来的成本而增加。当猎物因其行为已经很显眼时,警戒色外观(鲜艳的颜色等)的进化就更容易解释了,因为警戒色特征几乎不会增加显眼性的额外成本,但却能带来巨大的益处。

相似文献

1
Aposematism: what should our starting point be?警戒色:我们的出发点应该是什么?
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 22;272(1561):431-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2968.
2
Ontogenetic colour change and the evolution of aposematism: a case study in panic moth caterpillars.个体发育过程中的颜色变化与警戒色的进化:以惊恐蛾毛虫为例的研究
J Anim Ecol. 2007 May;76(3):439-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01216.x.
3
The dual benefits of aposematism: predator avoidance and enhanced resource collection.警戒色的双重好处:避免捕食者和增强资源收集。
Evolution. 2010 Jun;64(6):1622-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00931.x. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
4
Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence.猛禽会根据化学防御机制对具有警戒色的猎物产生味觉排斥。
Biol Lett. 2006 Sep 22;2(3):348-50. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0483.
5
Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights.显著警告信号的传播条件:一个具有新颖见解的数值模型
Evolution. 2006 Nov;60(11):2246-56.
6
Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness.警戒信号以及醒目性与独特性之间的关系。
J Theor Biol. 2007 Mar 21;245(2):268-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.10.022. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
7
Aposematism: balancing salience and camouflage.警戒色:平衡显著度与伪装
Biol Lett. 2016 Aug;12(8). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0335.
8
Conspicuous visual signals do not coevolve with increased body size in marine sea slugs.显眼的视觉信号不会与海洋海蛞蝓的体型增大共同进化。
J Evol Biol. 2014 Apr;27(4):676-87. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12348. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
9
The effect of metapopulation dynamics on the survival and spread of a novel, conspicuous prey.局域种群动态对新型显著猎物的生存和扩散的影响。
J Theor Biol. 2010 Dec 7;267(3):319-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.08.027. Epub 2010 Sep 4.
10
Honest signaling and the uses of prey coloration.诚实信号与猎物拟态的用途。
Am Nat. 2011 Jul;178(1):E1-9. doi: 10.1086/660197.

引用本文的文献

1
Foraging predicts the evolution of warning coloration and mimicry in snakes.觅食行为预测了蛇类警戒色和拟态的进化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 12;121(11):e2318857121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2318857121. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
2
Macroevolution of protective coloration across caterpillars reflects relationships with host plants.保护色在毛毛虫中的宏观进化反映了它们与宿主植物的关系。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Jan 25;290(1991):20222293. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2293. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
3
Butterfly mimicry rings run in circles.蝶类拟态环呈环状分布。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jan 24;120(4):e2220680120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220680120. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
4
Using colour pattern edge contrast statistics to predict detection speed and success in triggerfish (Rhinecanthus aculeatus).利用颜色图案边缘对比度统计来预测扳机鱼(Rhinecanthus aculeatus)的检测速度和成功率。
J Exp Biol. 2022 Dec 1;225(23). doi: 10.1242/jeb.244677. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
5
Factors determining the dorsal coloration pattern of aposematic salamanders.影响警戒色蝾螈背部颜色模式的因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 12;12(1):17090. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19466-0.
6
Conspicuous animal signals avoid the cost of predation by being intermittent or novel: confirmation in the wild using hundreds of robotic prey.显眼的动物信号通过间歇性或新颖性来避免被捕食的代价:利用数百个机器猎物在野外进行的验证。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jun 9;288(1952):20210706. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0706.
7
Out in the open: behavior's effect on predation risk and thermoregulation by aposematic caterpillars.暴露在外:行为对警戒色毛虫捕食风险和体温调节的影响
Behav Ecol. 2020 Jul-Aug;31(4):1031-1039. doi: 10.1093/beheco/araa048. Epub 2020 May 20.
8
Toxicity and Alkaloid Profiling of the Skin of the Golfo Dulcean Poison Frog Phyllobates vittatus (Dendrobatidae).毒性与戈尔福杜尔西恩毒蛙 Phyllobates vittatus(树蛙科)皮肤生物碱分析。
J Chem Ecol. 2019 Dec;45(11-12):914-925. doi: 10.1007/s10886-019-01116-x. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
9
Geographic variation of melanisation patterns in a hornet species: genetic differences, climatic pressures or aposematic constraints?一种胡蜂物种黑化模式的地理变异:遗传差异、气候压力还是警戒限制?
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 16;9(4):e94162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094162. eCollection 2014.
10
Phenotypic integration emerges from aposematism and scale in poison frogs.表型整合源于毒蛙的警戒色和鳞片。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 12;108(15):6175-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010952108. Epub 2011 Mar 28.

本文引用的文献

1
SURVIVAL OF DISTASTEFUL INSECTS AFTER BEING ATTACKED BY NAIVE BIRDS: A REAPPRAISAL OF THE THEORY OF APOSEMATIC COLORATION EVOLVING THROUGH INDIVIDUAL SELECTION.被未接触过的鸟类攻击后难吃昆虫的存活:对通过个体选择进化的警戒色理论的重新评估
Evolution. 1982 Sep;36(5):998-1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05468.x.
2
THE EVOLUTION OF APOSEMATIC COLORATION IN DISTASTEFUL PREY: AN INDIVIDUAL SELECTION MODEL.难吃猎物中警戒色的进化:一个个体选择模型
Evolution. 1983 Sep;37(5):993-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05627.x.
3
WHY DISTASTEFUL BUTTERFLIES HAVE APOSEMATIC LARVAE AND ADULTS, BUT CRYPTIC PUPAE: EVIDENCE FROM PREDATION EXPERIMENTS ON THE MONARCH AND THE EUROPEAN SWALLOWTAIL.为何令人厌恶的蝴蝶幼虫和成虫具有警戒色,而成虫蛹却具有保护色:来自黑脉金斑蝶和欧洲粉蝶捕食实验的证据
Evolution. 1985 Sep;39(5):1155-1158. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00456.x.
4
Reproduction and the energy cost of defense in a Batesian mimicry complex.贝氏拟态复合体中的繁殖与防御的能量消耗
Oecologia. 1990 Aug;84(1):69-73. doi: 10.1007/BF00665597.
5
Foraging-predation risk trade-offs, habitat selection, and the coexistence of competitors.觅食 - 捕食风险权衡、栖息地选择与竞争者共存
Am Nat. 2002 Jan;159(1):106-12. doi: 10.1086/324124.
6
Constrained camouflage facilitates the evolution of conspicuous warning coloration.受限伪装促进了显著警戒色的进化。
Evolution. 2005 Jan;59(1):38-45.
7
Warning signals and predator-prey coevolution.警告信号与捕食者 - 猎物协同进化
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 7;271(1550):1859-65. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2795.
8
The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense.作为猎物防御可靠指标的警告信号的演变。
Am Nat. 2003 Oct;162(4):377-89. doi: 10.1086/378047. Epub 2003 Oct 16.
9
A role for phenotypic plasticity in the evolution of aposematism.表型可塑性在警戒色进化中的作用。
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Aug 22;269(1501):1639-44. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2060.
10
The coevolution of warning signals.警示信号的协同进化
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 7;269(1492):741-6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1944.