• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮颈动脉支架置入术:一种不断发展的策略。

Percutaneous carotid artery stenting: a strategy in evolution.

作者信息

Kovacic J C, Roy P R, Baron D W, Gunalingam B, Muller D W M

机构信息

St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2005 Mar;35(3):143-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2004.00756.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2004.00756.x
PMID:15737133
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid stenting was initially proposed as an alternative to surgical endarterectomy for selected high-risk patients. More recently, patients of standard surgical risk are being considered for percutaneous treatment of their carotid disease.

AIMS

To describe the clinical outcomes of an initial consecutive cohort of patients treated by carotid stenting at one institution.

METHODS

Between December 1997 and July 2003, 111 patients underwent stenting of 118 carotid arteries. Peri-procedural and long-term outcome data were collected.

RESULTS

Most patients (>70%) were high-risk candidates for endarterectomy. Stents were successfully placed in 117/118 carotid arteries (99.2%). Distal protection devices were used in 43/118 (36.4%). The peri-procedural rate of death or disabling stroke was 3/118 (2.5%). Death or any stroke occurred in 11/118 (9.3%). However, only 7/118 (5.9%) procedures resulted in death or any persistent stroke (neurological deficit >1 week post-procedure). No myocardial infarction occurred. Median length of post-procedure hospitalization was 1 day. Long-term follow up was possible for 101 patients (91.0%) over a mean period of 27.1 months. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival free of ipsilateral stroke 36 and 66 months after carotid stenting was 77.0 +/- 9.5% and 68.2 +/- 15.1%, respectively. The estimated survival free of any stroke or stent failure was 70.9 +/- 10.7% and 60.7 +/- 17.4%, respectively. The majority of late deaths (7/11) were due to cardiac disease.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that stenting of carotid stenoses is feasible, with a high procedural success rate and low complication rate. Carotid stenting should be considered the procedure of choice for high-risk patients.

摘要

背景

颈动脉支架置入术最初是作为一种为特定高危患者替代外科动脉内膜切除术的方法而提出的。最近,具有标准手术风险的患者也在考虑接受经皮颈动脉疾病治疗。

目的

描述在一家机构接受颈动脉支架置入术的首批连续队列患者的临床结果。

方法

在1997年12月至2003年7月期间,111例患者接受了118条颈动脉的支架置入术。收集了围手术期和长期结果数据。

结果

大多数患者(>70%)是动脉内膜切除术的高危候选人。118条颈动脉中有117条成功置入支架(99.2%)。118条中有43条(36.4%)使用了远端保护装置。围手术期死亡或致残性卒中发生率为3/118(2.5%)。11/118(9.3%)发生死亡或任何卒中。然而,只有7/118(5.9%)的手术导致死亡或任何持续性卒中(术后神经功能缺损>1周)。未发生心肌梗死。术后住院时间中位数为1天。101例患者(91.0%)进行了长期随访,平均随访时间为27.1个月。颈动脉支架置入术后36个月和66个月无同侧卒中的Kaplan-Meier生存率估计分别为77.0±9.5%和68.2±15.1%。无任何卒中和支架失败的估计生存率分别为70.9±10.7%和60.7±17.4%。大多数晚期死亡(7/11)归因于心脏病。

结论

我们得出结论,颈动脉狭窄支架置入术是可行的,手术成功率高且并发症发生率低。颈动脉支架置入术应被视为高危患者的首选手术方法。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous carotid artery stenting: a strategy in evolution.经皮颈动脉支架置入术:一种不断发展的策略。
Intern Med J. 2005 Mar;35(3):143-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2004.00756.x.
2
Exclusion of atherosclerotic plaque from the circulation using stent-grafts: alternative to carotid stenting with a protection device?使用覆膜支架将动脉粥样硬化斑块排除在循环系统之外:是否可替代带有保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术?
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007 Sep-Oct;30(5):854-60. doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9010-0.
3
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术对于外翻式内膜切除术术后复发性狭窄的治疗是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1.
4
Report on initial experience with transradial access for carotid artery stenting.经桡动脉途径行颈动脉支架置入术的初步经验报告。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jun;45(6):1136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.035.
5
A comparison of carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection versus carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia.局部麻醉下颈动脉支架置入术联合神经保护与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较。
Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):696-700. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.005.
6
[Percutaneous carotid angioplasty with stent implantation and protection device against embolism--a prospective study of 100 consecutive cases].[经皮颈动脉血管成形术联合支架植入及抗栓塞保护装置——100例连续病例的前瞻性研究]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2003 Apr 11;128(15):790-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38581.
7
Carotid artery stenting with cerebral protection in 100 consecutive patients: immediate and two-year follow-up results.100例连续患者行颈动脉支架置入术并给予脑保护:即刻及两年随访结果
Ital Heart J. 2003 Oct;4(10):695-700.
8
In-stent recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stenting: life table analysis and clinical relevance.颈动脉支架置入术后支架内再狭窄:生命表分析及临床意义
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Dec;38(6):1162-8; discussion 1169. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.08.021.
9
Percutaneous stenting of the internal carotid artery: the European CAST I Study. Carotid Artery Stent Trial.经皮颈内动脉支架置入术:欧洲CAST I研究。颈动脉支架试验。
J Endovasc Surg. 1999 May;6(2):155-9. doi: 10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0155:PSOTIC>2.0.CO;2.
10
Carotid artery stenting in high risk patients with carotid artery stenosis not eligible for endarterectomy: clinical outcome after 5 years.颈动脉狭窄高危患者行颈动脉支架置入术而非内膜切除术的5年临床结局
Isr Med Assoc J. 2008 Feb;10(2):121-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Carotid artery stenting using a novel self-expanding braided nickel-titanium stent: feasibility and safety porcine trial.使用新型自膨胀编织镍钛合金支架进行颈动脉支架置入术:猪试验的可行性和安全性
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009 Sep;32(5):1019-27. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9572-0. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
2
A rare complication of carotid artery stenting: displacement of marker ring causing locking of stent and incomplete stent expansion.颈动脉支架置入术的一种罕见并发症:标记环移位导致支架锁定及支架扩张不完全。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Aug;28(7):1403-4. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0562.