Pinter Laszlo, Cagiannos Catherine, Ruzsa Zoltan, Bakoyiannis Chris, Kolvenbach Ralf
Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, Augusta Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany.
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jun;45(6):1136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.035.
Carotid artery stenting is emerging as an attractive alternative to surgical endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid artery disease. This study reports our initial experience using the radial artery as access for carotid stenting.
A retrospective study was performed in which 20 consecutive patients at high risk for carotid endarterectomy underwent carotid stenting with cerebral protection using radial artery access. All procedures were performed in the operating room from March 2006 to December 2006. Seven lesions were symptomatic, and 13 lesions were asymptomatic. Patients were evaluated for development of stroke or transient ischemic attacks, myocardial infarction, access site complications, procedural success, time to patient mobilization, and need for intravenous analgesia.
Procedural success was achieved in 18 patients (90%). Intense radial artery vasospasm resulted in one failure, and the second failure occurred in a patient with a left-sided carotid lesion and type I arch. The 30-day incidence of stroke, transient ischemic attacks, myocardial infarction, and death was 0%. Radial artery occlusion only occurred in the one patient because of the development of intense vasospasm during the procedure. One patient had persistent local pain requiring intravenous medication for relief. All patients were mobilized <or=2 hours of intervention and were discharged on the first postoperative day.
Carotid artery stenting with cerebral protection devices can be safely and effectively performed, with acceptable morbidity and high technical success, by using radial artery access. We recommend obtaining imaging of the aortic arch and supra-aortic trunks with computed tomography, as well as a duplex scan of radial artery, before attempting carotid artery stenting using radial artery access. Further study is needed before recommending that femoral access be replaced by radial access for carotid artery intervention.
对于颈动脉疾病的治疗,颈动脉支架置入术正逐渐成为一种比外科动脉内膜切除术更具吸引力的替代方法。本研究报告了我们使用桡动脉作为颈动脉支架置入术入路的初步经验。
进行了一项回顾性研究,连续20例有颈动脉内膜切除术高风险的患者接受了经桡动脉入路并使用脑保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术。所有手术均于2006年3月至2006年12月在手术室进行。7处病变有症状,13处病变无症状。对患者进行了中风或短暂性脑缺血发作、心肌梗死、穿刺部位并发症、手术成功率、患者活动时间以及静脉镇痛需求的评估。
18例患者(90%)手术成功。严重的桡动脉血管痉挛导致1例手术失败,另1例失败发生在左侧颈动脉病变且为I型主动脉弓的患者。30天内中风、短暂性脑缺血发作、心肌梗死和死亡的发生率为0%。仅1例患者因术中发生严重血管痉挛而出现桡动脉闭塞。1例患者有持续性局部疼痛,需要静脉用药缓解。所有患者在干预后≤2小时即可活动,并于术后第一天出院。
使用脑保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术通过桡动脉入路可安全有效地进行,发病率可接受且技术成功率高。我们建议在尝试经桡动脉入路进行颈动脉支架置入术前,通过计算机断层扫描获取主动脉弓和主动脉弓上分支的影像,以及桡动脉的双功超声扫描。在推荐将股动脉入路替换为桡动脉入路用于颈动脉介入治疗之前,还需要进一步研究。