• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[多孔生物材料在脊柱外科手术中的应用价值]

[Interest of porous biomaterials in spinal surgery].

作者信息

Finiels P J

机构信息

Unité de Neurochirurgie et Pathologie Rachidienne, Polyclinique Chirurgicale Kennedy, avenue Kennedy, 30900 Nîmes, France.

出版信息

Neurochirurgie. 2004 Dec;50(6):630-8. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3770(04)98454-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0028-3770(04)98454-8
PMID:15738883
Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The aim of this work was to study the behavior of porous alumina ceramic cages in spinal cervical surgery, with or without plate fixation as needed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The population included 61 patients who underwent spinal surgery between May 1999 and October 2003. There were 48 women and 13 men, mean age 49 years at surgery. 74 implants were used, among them 71 were interbody cages. Ten patients were operated at two levels; C5-C6 and C6-C7 were most frequently instrumented. Patients were reviewed at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months, and, whenever possible more after. Clinical and radiological data were available for all patients.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 7.2 months. Postoperative clinical data included assessment of neck and arm pain, using a visual analogic scale and fusion status determined by the presence of trabecular bridging bone and the disappearance of lucent lines around the implant on plain anteroposterior and lateral cervical radiographs. Two patients required another intervention, allowing intra-operative assessment of the quality of fusion. Clinical results were in agreement with the usual outcome reported in the literature with 54% of patients free of postoperative neck or arm pain and restriction of function mild or absent in 88%. Bone healing was achieved at 6 months on the average in 58 cases and in all patients at 12 months, including the two patients who required revision.

DISCUSSION

The porous alumine cage is a reliable biocompatible and mechanically stable element helpful for achieving bone healing. Integration into bone tissue was radiographically satisfactory. This kind of implant appears to be an attractive alternative in spinal cervical surgery, avoiding donor graft site complications.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在探讨多孔氧化铝陶瓷椎间融合器在颈椎手术中的应用情况,手术中根据需要决定是否使用钢板固定。

材料与方法

研究对象为1999年5月至2003年10月期间接受脊柱手术的61例患者。其中女性48例,男性13例,手术时平均年龄49岁。共使用了74枚植入物,其中71枚为椎间融合器。10例患者接受了两个节段的手术;最常进行手术的节段是C5-C6和C6-C7。分别在术后1个月、3个月和6个月对患者进行复查,如有可能,还会进行更长期的随访。所有患者均有临床和影像学资料。

结果

平均随访时间为7.2个月。术后临床资料包括采用视觉模拟评分法评估颈部和手臂疼痛情况,以及通过颈椎正侧位X线片上植入物周围小梁骨桥接的出现和透亮线的消失来确定融合状态。2例患者需要再次手术,以便在术中评估融合质量。临床结果与文献报道的常见结果一致,54%的患者术后颈部或手臂无痛,88%的患者功能受限轻微或无功能受限。平均58例患者在6个月时实现了骨愈合,所有患者在12个月时均实现了骨愈合,包括2例需要翻修的患者。

讨论

多孔氧化铝椎间融合器是一种可靠的生物相容性好且机械稳定性高的元件,有助于实现骨愈合。在影像学上,其与骨组织的融合情况令人满意。这种植入物似乎是颈椎手术中一种有吸引力的选择,可避免供体骨移植部位的并发症。

相似文献

1
[Interest of porous biomaterials in spinal surgery].[多孔生物材料在脊柱外科手术中的应用价值]
Neurochirurgie. 2004 Dec;50(6):630-8. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3770(04)98454-8.
2
[Utilization of a porous alumina ceramic spacer in tibial valgus open-wedge osteotomy: fifty cases at 16 months mean follow-up].多孔氧化铝陶瓷间隔器在胫骨外翻开放楔形截骨术中的应用:平均随访16个月的50例病例
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002 Sep;88(5):480-5.
3
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with implantable titanium cage: initial impressions, patient outcomes and comparison to fusion with allograft.前路颈椎间盘切除及可植入钛笼融合术:初步印象、患者预后及与同种异体骨融合术的比较
Spine J. 2004 Mar-Apr;4(2):184-91; discussion 191. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.05.001.
4
Anterior cervical interbody fusion with a titanium box cage: early radiological assessment of fusion and subsidence.前路颈椎椎间融合术联合钛盒融合器:融合及下沉的早期影像学评估
Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):645-9; discussion 649. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.07.007.
5
The efficacy of the synthetic interbody cage and Grafton for anterior cervical fusion.合成椎间融合器与Grafton用于颈椎前路融合术的疗效。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):E591-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ab8b9a.
6
Anterior cervical arthrodesis using DOC dynamic stabilization implant for improvement in sagittal angulation and controlled settling.使用DOC动态稳定植入物进行颈椎前路融合术以改善矢状面成角和控制沉降。
J Neurosurg. 2003 Jan;98(1 Suppl):8-13. doi: 10.3171/spi.2003.98.1.0008.
7
[Mid-term results of 360-degree lumbar spondylodesis with the use of a tantalum implant for disc replacement].使用钽植入物进行椎间盘置换的360度腰椎融合术的中期结果
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Oct;76(5):388-93.
8
Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与股骨皮质骨同种异体移植作为单节段椎间融合器在经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中的比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Dec;5(6):534-9. doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.5.6.534.
9
[Clinical research of dynamic cervical implant and cage fusion in two-level cervical disc protrusion].[动力型颈椎植入物与椎间融合器治疗两节段颈椎间盘突出症的临床研究]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;28(1):60-3.
10
[Experience with Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) cages and locking plate for anterior cervical fusion in the treatment of spine trauma without cord injury].聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器及锁定钢板用于无脊髓损伤的颈椎前路融合术治疗脊柱创伤的经验
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 Dec;93(8):789-97. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)78462-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Speed and quality of interbody fusion in porous bioceramic AlO and polyetheretherketone cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparative study.多孔生物陶瓷 AlO 和聚醚醚酮笼在颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中对椎间融合速度和质量的影响:一项对比研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 3;18(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03625-8.
2
Preliminary results of anterior cervical arthroplasty by porous alumina ceramic cage for cervical disc herniation surgery.多孔氧化铝陶瓷椎间融合器用于颈椎间盘突出症手术的前路颈椎置换术初步结果
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):223-226. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_95_18.
3
Commentary: Bioceramics and Scaffolds: A Winning Combination for Tissue Engineering.
评论:生物陶瓷与支架:组织工程的成功组合。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017 Mar 8;5:15. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2017.00015. eCollection 2017.