• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[使用LapSim虚拟现实模拟器评估腹腔镜手术技能。初步结果]

[The use of LapSim virtual reality simulator in the evaluation of laparoscopic surgery skill. Preliminary results].

作者信息

Tomulescu V, Popescu I

机构信息

Centrul de Chirurgie Generală şi Transplant Hepatic, Institutul Clinic Fundeni, Bucureşti.

出版信息

Chirurgia (Bucur). 2004 Nov-Dec;99(6):523-7.

PMID:15739670
Abstract

The aim of this study is to establish if the results obtained in the evaluation of the candidates for the laparoscopic surgery competence using the LapSim virtual reality simulator are comparable with intraoperative evaluation. For this study has been evaluated in front of the LapSim and in the operating room a number of 12 surgeons who have achieved the criteria for laparoscopic surgery competence evaluation. The results of any one of the candidates have been evaluated, on Lapsim and by the exam committee in the operation room relating to four criteria: (1) utilization of 300 camera; (2) manipulation and coordination of laparoscopic instruments, suturing; (3) grasping and cutting; (4) clip applying. The evaluation has been made relating to the time need for every candidate to perform the asked task, and the subjective evaluation of the examining committee with marks from 1 to 10. The LapSim evaluation, in concordance with intraoperative evaluation managed to establish 2 candidates with deficiency in manipulation and coordination of laparoscopic instruments, and difficulty in the laparoscopic bidimensional field orientation. We consider this experiment only the beginning in the evaluation of the utility of virtual reality simulator in the training and examination of the results in laparoscopic surgery. We consider that large series of subjects with different levels of knowledge in laparoscopic surgery have to be evaluated to conclude if the benefit of laparoscopic surgery virtual reality simulator is the same as in airplane pilots.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定使用LapSim虚拟现实模拟器对腹腔镜手术能力候选人进行评估所获得的结果是否与术中评估结果具有可比性。在本研究中,对12名达到腹腔镜手术能力评估标准的外科医生在LapSim前和手术室进行了评估。对任何一名候选人的结果,在LapSim上以及由手术室的考试委员会根据以下四个标准进行了评估:(1)300摄像头的使用;(2)腹腔镜器械的操作与协调、缝合;(3)抓取与切割;(4)夹闭应用。评估涉及每位候选人完成所要求任务所需的时间,以及考试委员会从1到10分的主观评价。与术中评估一致,LapSim评估确定了2名在腹腔镜器械操作与协调方面存在不足以及在腹腔镜二维视野定向方面存在困难的候选人。我们认为这个实验仅仅是评估虚拟现实模拟器在腹腔镜手术培训和结果检查中的效用的开端。我们认为必须对大量具有不同腹腔镜手术知识水平的受试者进行评估,以确定腹腔镜手术虚拟现实模拟器的益处是否与飞机飞行员的相同。

相似文献

1
[The use of LapSim virtual reality simulator in the evaluation of laparoscopic surgery skill. Preliminary results].[使用LapSim虚拟现实模拟器评估腹腔镜手术技能。初步结果]
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2004 Nov-Dec;99(6):523-7.
2
[New perspectives in laparoscopic simulation: from students' skills lab to stress evaluation].[腹腔镜模拟的新视角:从学生技能实验室到压力评估]
Zentralbl Chir. 2008 Jun;133(3):244-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1004744.
3
Documenting a learning curve and test-retest reliability of two tasks on a virtual reality training simulator in laparoscopic surgery.记录腹腔镜手术虚拟现实训练模拟器上两项任务的学习曲线和重测信度。
J Surg Educ. 2007 Nov-Dec;64(6):424-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.08.007.
4
Correlating virtual reality and box trainer tasks in the assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills.在腹腔镜手术技能评估中关联虚拟现实与箱式训练器任务
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;197(5):546.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.026.
5
Skills assessment using a virtual reality simulator, LapSim, after training to develop fundamental skills for endoscopic surgery.使用虚拟现实模拟器LapSim进行技能评估,该评估在训练以培养内镜手术基本技能之后开展。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19(1):24-9. doi: 10.3109/13645700903492993.
6
Skills acquired on virtual reality laparoscopic simulators transfer into the operating room in a blinded, randomised, controlled trial.在一项双盲、随机、对照试验中,虚拟现实腹腔镜模拟器上获得的技能可转移到手术室中。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;125:76-81.
7
Does training novices to criteria and does rapid acquisition of skills on laparoscopic simulators have predictive validity or are we just playing video games?训练新手达到标准以及在腹腔镜模拟器上快速掌握技能是否具有预测效度,还是说我们只是在玩电子游戏?
J Surg Educ. 2008 Nov-Dec;65(6):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.05.008.
8
The LapSim: a learning environment for both experts and novices.LapSim:一个面向专家和新手的学习环境。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;111:414-7.
9
Objective evaluation of minimally invasive surgical skills for transplantation. Surgeons using a virtual reality simulator.移植微创手术技能的客观评估。使用虚拟现实模拟器的外科医生。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2009 Mar-Apr;104(2):181-5.
10
Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.增强现实与虚拟现实腹腔镜模拟:有何区别?ProMIS增强现实腹腔镜模拟器与LapSim虚拟现实腹腔镜模拟器的比较。
World J Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):764-72. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0724-y.

引用本文的文献

1
The LapSim virtual reality simulator: promising but not yet proven.拉普模拟虚拟现实模拟器:有前景但尚未得到证实。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):343-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1181-0. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
2
Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.增强现实与虚拟现实腹腔镜模拟:有何区别?ProMIS增强现实腹腔镜模拟器与LapSim虚拟现实腹腔镜模拟器的比较。
World J Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):764-72. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0724-y.