增强现实与虚拟现实腹腔镜模拟:有何区别?ProMIS增强现实腹腔镜模拟器与LapSim虚拟现实腹腔镜模拟器的比较。
Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
作者信息
Botden Sanne M B I, Buzink Sonja N, Schijven Marlies P, Jakimowicz Jack J
机构信息
Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
出版信息
World J Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):764-72. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0724-y.
BACKGROUND
Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging new modality for laparoscopic skills training; however, most simulators lack realistic haptic feedback. Augmented reality (AR) is a new laparoscopic simulation system offering a combination of physical objects and VR simulation. Laparoscopic instruments are used within an hybrid mannequin on tissue or objects while using video tracking. This study was designed to assess the difference in realism, haptic feedback, and didactic value between AR and VR laparoscopic simulation.
METHODS
The ProMIS AR and LapSim VR simulators were used in this study. The participants performed a basic skills task and a suturing task on both simulators, after which they filled out a questionnaire about their demographics and their opinion of both simulators scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The participants were allotted to 3 groups depending on their experience: experts, intermediates and novices. Significant differences were calculated with the paired t-test.
RESULTS
There was general consensus in all groups that the ProMIS AR laparoscopic simulator is more realistic than the LapSim VR laparoscopic simulator in both the basic skills task (mean 4.22 resp. 2.18, P < 0.000) as well as the suturing task (mean 4.15 resp. 1.85, P < 0.000). The ProMIS is regarded as having better haptic feedback (mean 3.92 resp. 1.92, P < 0.000) and as being more useful for training surgical residents (mean 4.51 resp. 2.94, P < 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS
In comparison with the VR simulator, the AR laparoscopic simulator was regarded by all participants as a better simulator for laparoscopic skills training on all tested features.
背景
虚拟现实(VR)是一种新兴的腹腔镜技能训练方式;然而,大多数模拟器缺乏逼真的触觉反馈。增强现实(AR)是一种新的腹腔镜模拟系统,它结合了实物与VR模拟。在使用视频跟踪技术时,腹腔镜器械在混合人体模型内用于处理组织或物体。本研究旨在评估AR和VR腹腔镜模拟在真实感、触觉反馈和教学价值方面的差异。
方法
本研究使用了ProMIS AR和LapSim VR模拟器。参与者在两个模拟器上分别执行一项基本技能任务和一项缝合任务,之后填写一份关于其人口统计学信息以及对两个模拟器看法的问卷,看法采用5分李克特量表评分。参与者根据经验被分为3组:专家组、中级组和新手组。使用配对t检验计算显著差异。
结果
所有组普遍认为,在基本技能任务(平均分为4.22和2.18,P < 0.000)以及缝合任务(平均分为4.15和1.85,P < 0.000)中,ProMIS AR腹腔镜模拟器比LapSim VR腹腔镜模拟器更逼真。ProMIS被认为具有更好的触觉反馈(平均分为3.92和1.92,P < 0.000),并且对培训外科住院医师更有用(平均分为4.51和2.94,P < 0.000)。
结论
与VR模拟器相比,所有参与者都认为AR腹腔镜模拟器在所有测试特征方面都是更好的腹腔镜技能训练模拟器。