David Kristin M, Morris Jonathan A, Steffen Bettina J, Chi-Burris Kathy S, Gotz Vincent P, Gordon Robert D
ProSanos Corporation, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Clin Transplant. 2005 Apr;19(2):279-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00338.x.
Outcomes specifically in mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-treated diabetic renal transplant patients have not been previously reported. This study compared acute rejection (AR), late acute rejection (LAR), patient survival [and specifically death from cardiovascular (CV), infectious and malignant causes], incidence of post-transplant malignancies, and graft loss in MMF- or azathioprine (AZA)-treated renal transplant patients with pre-transplant diabetes. Outcomes were compared between MMF- (n = 14 144) and AZA- (n = 3001) treated diabetic patients using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data on all U.S. adult renal transplants performed between 1995 and 2002. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox multivariable regression and chi-square tests. MMF patients had less AR compared with AZA-treated patients (23.5% vs. 28.3%, p < 0.001) and less risk for LAR over 4 yr [hazard ratio (HR): 0.64, 95% CI 0.44, 0.92; p = 0.02]. While time to any-cause death did not differ between the groups, MMF treatment was associated with a 20% decreased risk of CV death (HR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.67, 0.97; p = 0.020) compared with AZA treatment. MMF patients also had a lower incidence of malignancies than AZA patients (2.2% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). These results suggest treatment with MMF compared with treatment with AZA in diabetic transplant patients is associated with less AR, less risk of LAR, a decreased risk of CV death, and a lower incidence of malignancies.
此前尚未有关于霉酚酸酯(MMF)治疗的糖尿病肾移植患者具体预后情况的报道。本研究比较了接受MMF或硫唑嘌呤(AZA)治疗的移植前患有糖尿病的肾移植患者的急性排斥反应(AR)、迟发性急性排斥反应(LAR)、患者生存率[尤其是心血管(CV)、感染和恶性肿瘤导致的死亡]、移植后恶性肿瘤的发生率以及移植物丢失情况。利用移植受者科学注册中心关于1995年至2002年间在美国进行的所有成人肾移植的数据,对接受MMF治疗(n = 14144)和AZA治疗(n = 3001)的糖尿病患者的预后进行了比较。统计分析包括Kaplan-Meier生存分析、Cox多变量回归分析和卡方检验。与接受AZA治疗的患者相比,接受MMF治疗的患者AR发生率更低(23.5%对28.3%,p < 0.001),且在4年期间发生LAR的风险更低[风险比(HR):0.64,95%置信区间0.44,0.92;p = 0.02]。虽然两组间全因死亡时间无差异,但与AZA治疗相比,MMF治疗使CV死亡风险降低了20%(HR:0.80,95%置信区间0.67,0.97;p = 0.020)。MMF治疗的患者恶性肿瘤发生率也低于AZA治疗的患者(2.2%对3.7%,p < 0.001)。这些结果表明,与AZA治疗相比,MMF治疗糖尿病移植患者与更少的AR、更低的LAR风险、更低的CV死亡风险以及更低的恶性肿瘤发生率相关。