Gravel Jocelyn, Gouin Serge, Manzano Sergio, Arsenault Michael, Amre Devendra
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1262-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00268.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
The objective was to measure the interrater agreement between nurses assigning triage levels to children visiting a pediatric emergency departments (EDs) assisted by a computerized version of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (PedCTAS).
This was a prospective cohort study evaluating children triaged from Level 2 (emergent) to Level 5 (nonurgent). A convenience sample of patients triaged during 38 shifts from April to September 2007 in a tertiary care pediatric ED was evaluated. All patients were initially triaged by regular triage nurses using a computerized version of the PedCTAS. Research nurses performed a second evaluation blinded to the first evaluation using the same triage tool. These research nurses were regular ED nurses performing extra hours for research purposes exclusively. The primary outcome measure was the interrater agreement between the two nurses as measured by the linear weighted kappa score. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patient for which nurses did not apply the triage level suggested by Staturg (override) and agreement for these overrides.
A total of 499 patients were recruited. The overall interrater agreement was moderate (linear weighted kappa score of 0.55 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 0.48 to 0.61] and quadratic weighted kappa score of 0.61 [95% CI = 0.42 to 0.80]). There was a discrepancy of more than one level in only 10 patients (2% of the study population). Overrides occurred in 23.2 and 21.8% for regular and research triage nurses, respectively. These overrides were equally distributed between increase and decrease in triage level.
Nurses using Staturg, which is a computerized version of the PedCTAS, demonstrated moderate interrater agreement for assignment of triage level to children presenting to a pediatric ED.
本研究旨在测量在使用计算机版加拿大儿科分诊及 acuity 量表(PedCTAS)辅助的情况下,护士对儿科急诊科就诊儿童进行分诊分级时的评分者间一致性。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,评估从 2 级(紧急)到 5 级(非紧急)分诊的儿童。对 2007 年 4 月至 9 月期间在一家三级护理儿科急诊科 38 个班次中分诊的患者进行便利抽样评估。所有患者最初由常规分诊护士使用计算机版 PedCTAS 进行分诊。研究护士在对第一次评估不知情的情况下,使用相同的分诊工具进行第二次评估。这些研究护士是专门为研究目的额外工作时间的急诊科常规护士。主要结局指标是通过线性加权 kappa 评分测量的两位护士之间的评分者间一致性。次要结局包括护士未采用 Staturg 建议的分诊级别的患者比例(超控)以及这些超控的一致性。
共招募了 499 名患者。总体评分者间一致性为中等(线性加权 kappa 评分为 0.55[95%置信区间{CI}=0.48 至 0.61],二次加权 kappa 评分为 0.61[95%CI=0.42 至 0.80])。仅 10 名患者(占研究人群的 2%)的分诊级别差异超过一级。常规分诊护士和研究分诊护士的超控发生率分别为 23.2%和 21.8%。这些超控在分诊级别升高和降低之间均匀分布。
使用 PedCTAS 计算机版 Staturg 的护士在对儿科急诊科就诊儿童进行分诊分级时,表现出中等程度的评分者间一致性。