• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊严重程度指数第4版:在儿科患者中的可靠性

The Emergency Severity Index Version 4: reliability in pediatric patients.

作者信息

Durani Yamini, Brecher Deena, Walmsley Daniel, Attia Magdy W, Loiselle John M

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children/Thomas Jefferson University, 1600 Rockland Rd, Wilmington, DE 19899, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Aug;25(8):504-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181b0a0c6.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181b0a0c6
PMID:19633587
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Emergency Severity Index version 4 (ESI v.4) is a triage system, which demonstrates reliability in adult populations, however, it has not been extensively studied in pediatrics. The goal of this study was to measure interrater reliability and agreement rates within and between a group of pediatric emergency medicine physicians and pediatric triage (PT) nurses using ESI v.4 in a pediatric population.

METHODS

Pediatric emergency medicine physicians and PT nurses completed ESI v.4 training and a survey of 20 pediatric case scenarios, requiring them to assign a triage category to each case. Cases and standardized responses were adapted from the ESI v.4 training materials. Unweighted and weighted kappa was measured, and agreement rates for each group were compared with the standard response.

RESULTS

Sixteen physicians and 17 nurses completed the study. The group had a mean of 10.2 (+/-7.7) years experience in pediatrics. Nurses had a mean of 7.6 (+/-8.7) years experience in triage. Unweighted kappa for physicians and nurses was 0.68 and 0.67, respectively. Weighted kappa for physicians and nurses was 0.92 and 0.93, respectively. The agreement rate among physicians and nurses with the standardized responses to case scenarios was 83%.

CONCLUSIONS

ESI v.4 is a reliable tool for triage assessments in pediatric patients when used by experienced pediatric emergency medicine physicians and PT nurses. It is a triage system with high agreement between physicians and nurses.

摘要

目的

急诊严重程度指数第4版(ESI v.4)是一种分诊系统,已在成人人群中证明具有可靠性,然而,其在儿科领域尚未得到广泛研究。本研究的目的是在儿科人群中,使用ESI v.4测量一组儿科急诊医学医生和儿科分诊(PT)护士内部以及之间的评分者间信度和一致率。

方法

儿科急诊医学医生和PT护士完成了ESI v.4培训以及一项包含20个儿科病例场景的调查,要求他们为每个病例分配一个分诊类别。病例和标准化回复改编自ESI v.4培训材料。测量了未加权和加权kappa值,并将每组的一致率与标准回复进行比较。

结果

16名医生和17名护士完成了研究。该组在儿科领域的平均工作经验为10.2(±7.7)年。护士在分诊方面的平均工作经验为7.6(±8.7)年。医生和护士的未加权kappa值分别为0.68和0.67。医生和护士的加权kappa值分别为0.92和0.93。医生和护士对病例场景标准化回复的一致率为83%。

结论

当由经验丰富的儿科急诊医学医生和PT护士使用时,ESI v.4是用于儿科患者分诊评估的可靠工具。它是一种医生和护士之间一致性较高的分诊系统。

相似文献

1
The Emergency Severity Index Version 4: reliability in pediatric patients.急诊严重程度指数第4版:在儿科患者中的可靠性
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Aug;25(8):504-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181b0a0c6.
2
The Emergency Severity Index Version 4: reliability in pediatric patients.《急诊严重程度指数第4版:儿科患者中的可靠性》
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Nov;25(11):751-3.
3
Evaluation of the Emergency Severity Index (version 3) triage algorithm in pediatric patients.儿科患者中急诊严重程度指数(第3版)分诊算法的评估
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Mar;12(3):219-24. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.09.023.
4
Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage.急诊严重程度指数第4版:儿科急诊科分诊中有效且可靠的工具。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Aug;28(8):753-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182621813.
5
Reliability of a computerized version of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale.加拿大儿科分诊与 acuity 量表计算机化版本的可靠性。 (注:这里“acuity”可能是特定领域术语,结合语境可能指“ acuity scale” 为 “急症严重程度量表” 等类似含义,但仅根据提供文本只能按原样翻译)
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;14(10):864-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.018. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
6
Interrater agreement between nurses for the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care center.三级护理中心护士对加拿大儿科分诊及 acuity 量表的评分者间一致性。 (注:原文中“acuity”可能有误,推测可能是“Acuity Scale”即“ acuity scale”,意为“ acuity 量表”,这里按推测翻译。)
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1262-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00268.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
7
Reliability and validity of the emergency severity index for pediatric triage.儿科分诊紧急严重指数的可靠性和有效性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Sep;16(9):843-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00494.x.
8
Optimizing triage consistency in Australian emergency departments: the Emergency Triage Education Kit.优化澳大利亚急诊科的分诊一致性:急诊分诊教育套件
Emerg Med Australas. 2008 Jun;20(3):250-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2008.01089.x. Epub 2008 May 6.
9
Reliability of computerized emergency triage.计算机化急诊分诊的可靠性
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;13(3):269-75. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.10.014. Epub 2006 Feb 22.
10
Observer agreement of the Manchester Triage System and the Emergency Severity Index: a simulation study.曼彻斯特分诊系统与急诊严重程度指数的观察者一致性:一项模拟研究。
Emerg Med J. 2009 Aug;26(8):556-60. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.059378.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes for emergency severity index triage implementation in the emergency department.急诊科实施急诊严重程度指数分诊的结果。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr;9(4):OC04-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11791.5737. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
2
Reliability of the Emergency Severity Index: Meta-analysis.急诊严重程度指数的可靠性:荟萃分析。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2015 Feb;15(1):e71-7. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
3
Pulmonary function tests in emergency department pediatric patients with acute wheezing/asthma exacerbation.急诊科急性喘息/哮喘加重期儿科患者的肺功能测试
Pulm Med. 2012;2012:724139. doi: 10.1155/2012/724139. Epub 2012 Dec 10.