Suppr超能文献

遗传性黑色素瘤与预测性基因检测:为何不做?

Hereditary melanoma and predictive genetic testing: why not?

作者信息

Riedijk S R, de Snoo F A, van Dijk S, Bergman W, van Haeringen A, Silberg S, van Elderen T M T, Tibben A

机构信息

Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2005 Sep;14(9):738-45. doi: 10.1002/pon.901.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since p16-Leiden presymptomatic testing for hereditary melanoma has become available in the Netherlands, the benefits and risks of offering such testing are evaluated. The current paper investigated why the non-participants were reluctant to participate in genetic testing.

METHODS

Sixty six eligible individuals, who were knowledgeable about the test but had not participated in genetic testing by January 2003, completed a self-report questionnaire assessing motivation, anxiety, family dynamics, risk knowledge and causal attributions.

RESULTS

Non-participants reported anxiety levels below clinical significance. A principal components analysis on reasons for non-participation distinguished two underlying motives: emotional and rational motivation. Rational motivation for non-participation was associated with more accurate risk knowledge, the inclination to preselect mutation carriers within the family and lower scores on anxiety. Emotional motivation for non-participation was associated with disease misperceptions, hesitation to communicate unfavourable test results within the family and higher scores on anxiety.

CONCLUSION

Rational and emotional motivation for non-participation in the genetic test for hereditary melanoma was found. Emotionally motivated individuals may be reluctant to disseminate genetic risk information. Rationally motivated individuals were better informed than emotionally motivated individuals. It is suggested that a leaflet is added to the invitation letter to enhance informed decision-making about genetic testing.

摘要

背景

自从荷兰开展针对遗传性黑色素瘤的p16 - Leiden症状前检测以来,人们对提供此类检测的益处和风险进行了评估。本文调查了未参与者不愿参加基因检测的原因。

方法

66名符合条件的个体,他们了解该检测,但截至2003年1月尚未参加基因检测,完成了一份自我报告问卷,评估动机、焦虑、家庭动态、风险知识和因果归因。

结果

未参与者报告的焦虑水平低于临床显著水平。对未参与原因的主成分分析区分出两种潜在动机:情感动机和理性动机。未参与的理性动机与更准确的风险知识、在家族中预先选择突变携带者的倾向以及较低的焦虑得分相关。未参与的情感动机与对疾病的误解、在家族中传达不利检测结果的犹豫以及较高的焦虑得分相关。

结论

发现了遗传性黑色素瘤基因检测未参与者的理性和情感动机。受情感驱动的个体可能不愿传播基因风险信息。理性驱动的个体比情感驱动的个体了解得更多。建议在邀请函中增加一份传单,以加强关于基因检测的知情决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验