• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更多的基因还是更多的分类单元?基因数量和分类单元数量对系统发育准确性的相对贡献。

More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy.

作者信息

Rokas Antonis, Carroll Sean B

机构信息

Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.

出版信息

Mol Biol Evol. 2005 May;22(5):1337-44. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi121. Epub 2005 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1093/molbev/msi121
PMID:15746014
Abstract

The relative contribution of taxon number and gene number to accuracy in phylogenetic inference is a major issue in phylogenetics and of central importance to the choice of experimental strategies for the successful reconstruction of a broad sketch of the tree of life. Maximization of the number of taxa sampled is the strategy favored by most phylogeneticists, although its necessity remains the subject of debate. Vast increases in gene number are now possible due to advances in genomics, but large numbers of genes will be available for only modest numbers of taxa, raising the question of whether such genome-scale phylogenies will be robust to the addition of taxa. To examine the relative benefit of increasing taxon number or gene number to phylogenetic accuracy, we have developed an assay that utilizes the symmetric difference tree distance as a measure of phylogenetic accuracy. We have applied this assay to a genome-scale data matrix containing 106 genes from 14 yeast species. Our results show that increasing taxon number correlates with a slight decrease in phylogenetic accuracy. In contrast, increasing gene number has a significant positive effect on phylogenetic accuracy. Analyses of an additional taxon-rich data matrix from the same yeast clade show that taxon number does not have a significant effect on phylogenetic accuracy. The positive effect of gene number and the lack of effect of taxon number on phylogenetic accuracy are also corroborated by analyses of two data matrices from mammals and angiosperm plants, respectively. We conclude that, for typical data sets, the number of genes utilized may be a more important determinant of phylogenetic accuracy than taxon number.

摘要

在系统发育推断中,分类单元数量和基因数量对准确性的相对贡献是系统发育学中的一个主要问题,对于成功构建生命之树大致轮廓的实验策略选择至关重要。增加抽样分类单元的数量是大多数系统发育学家青睐的策略,尽管其必要性仍存在争议。由于基因组学的进展,现在基因数量大幅增加成为可能,但大量基因仅适用于数量有限的分类单元,这就引发了这样一个问题:这种基因组规模的系统发育对于分类单元的增加是否稳健。为了研究增加分类单元数量或基因数量对系统发育准确性的相对益处,我们开发了一种分析方法,该方法利用对称差异树距离作为系统发育准确性的度量。我们将此分析方法应用于一个包含来自14种酵母物种的106个基因的基因组规模数据矩阵。我们的结果表明,增加分类单元数量与系统发育准确性的轻微下降相关。相比之下,增加基因数量对系统发育准确性有显著的积极影响。对来自同一酵母进化枝的另一个分类单元丰富的数据矩阵的分析表明,分类单元数量对系统发育准确性没有显著影响。分别对来自哺乳动物和被子植物的两个数据矩阵的分析也证实了基因数量对系统发育准确性的积极影响以及分类单元数量的无影响。我们得出结论,对于典型数据集,所使用的基因数量可能比分类单元数量更重要地决定系统发育准确性。

相似文献

1
More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy.更多的基因还是更多的分类单元?基因数量和分类单元数量对系统发育准确性的相对贡献。
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 May;22(5):1337-44. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi121. Epub 2005 Mar 2.
2
Optimal selection of gene and ingroup taxon sampling for resolving phylogenetic relationships.最佳基因选择和内群分类单元抽样,用于解决系统发育关系。
Syst Biol. 2010 Jul;59(4):446-57. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq025. Epub 2010 May 19.
3
The phylogeny of Cetartiodactyla: the importance of dense taxon sampling, missing data, and the remarkable promise of cytochrome b to provide reliable species-level phylogenies.鲸偶蹄目的系统发育:密集分类群抽样、缺失数据的重要性,以及细胞色素b在提供可靠的物种水平系统发育方面的显著前景。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Sep;48(3):964-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.05.046. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
4
More taxa or more characters revisited: combining data from nuclear protein-encoding genes for phylogenetic analyses of Noctuoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera).重新审视更多分类单元或更多性状:整合来自核蛋白编码基因的数据用于夜蛾总科(昆虫纲:鳞翅目)的系统发育分析
Syst Biol. 2000 Jun;49(2):202-24.
5
Distinguishing terminal monophyletic groups from reticulate taxa: performance of phenetic, tree-based, and network procedures.区分终端单系类群与网状分类单元:表型、基于树和网络方法的性能
Syst Biol. 2007 Apr;56(2):302-20. doi: 10.1080/10635150701324225.
6
The systematic component of phylogenetic error as a function of taxonomic sampling under parsimony.在简约法下,系统发育误差的系统组成部分作为分类抽样的函数。
Syst Biol. 2005 Jun;54(3):432-40. doi: 10.1080/10635150590946745.
7
Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error.增加分类群抽样可大大减少系统发育误差。
Syst Biol. 2002 Aug;51(4):588-98. doi: 10.1080/10635150290102339.
8
A practical approach to phylogenomics: the phylogeny of ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii) as a case study.系统发育基因组学的实用方法:以辐鳍鱼纲(Actinopterygii)的系统发育为例
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Mar 20;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-44.
9
A multi-gene phylogeny of Clavicipitaceae (Ascomycota, Fungi): identification of localized incongruence using a combinational bootstrap approach.麦角菌科(子囊菌门,真菌)的多基因系统发育:使用组合自展法识别局部不一致性
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Sep;44(3):1204-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.011. Epub 2007 Mar 27.
10
Obtaining maximal concatenated phylogenetic data sets from large sequence databases.从大型序列数据库中获取最大串联系统发育数据集。
Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Jul;20(7):1036-42. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg115. Epub 2003 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A comprehensive multigene phylogeny of (, ), with an emphasis on tropical African species.(,)的全面多基因系统发育研究,重点关注热带非洲物种。
Persoonia. 2025 Jun;54:1-46. doi: 10.3114/persoonia.2025.54.01. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
2
Phylogenomics reveals the slow-burning fuse of diatom evolution.系统发育基因组学揭示了硅藻进化的缓慢导火索。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 3;122(22):e2500153122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500153122. Epub 2025 May 29.
3
Phylogeny, adaptive evolution, and taxonomy of (Apiaceae): evidence from plastid phylogenomics and morphological data.
(伞形科)的系统发育、适应性进化与分类学:来自质体系统发育基因组学和形态学数据的证据
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Aug 16;15:1425158. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1425158. eCollection 2024.
4
Historical biogeography and evolutionary diversification of (Liliaceae): New insights from plastome phylogenomics.(百合科)的历史生物地理学与进化多样化:来自叶绿体基因组系统发育基因组学的新见解
Plant Divers. 2023 Aug 3;46(2):219-228. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2023.07.009. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Optimizing ancestral trait reconstruction of large HIV Subtype C datasets through multiple-trait subsampling.通过多性状子采样优化大型HIV C亚型数据集的祖先性状重建
Virus Evol. 2023 Nov 22;9(2):vead069. doi: 10.1093/ve/vead069. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of complete chloroplast genome sequences of Salvia regarding its worldwide distribution.基于全球分布探讨丹参属植物叶绿体基因组全序列的比较和系统发育分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 31;13(1):14268. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41198-y.
7
Salmonidae Genome: Features, Evolutionary and Phylogenetic Characteristics.鲑科鱼类基因组:特征、进化和系统发育特征。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Nov 27;13(12):2221. doi: 10.3390/genes13122221.
8
Phylogeny and evolution of Asparagaceae subfamily Nolinoideae: new insights from plastid phylogenomics.石蒜科胡麻藤亚科的系统发育和进化:质体基因组系统发育学的新见解。
Ann Bot. 2023 Mar 8;131(2):301-312. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac144.
9
Testing Phylogenetic Stability with Variable Taxon Sampling.利用可变分类群采样检验系统发育稳定性。
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2569:167-188. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2691-7_8.
10
Plastome structure of 8 Calanthe s.l. species (Orchidaceae): comparative genomics, phylogenetic analysis.8 种 Calanthe s.l. 物种(兰科)的质体基因组结构:比较基因组学、系统发育分析。
BMC Plant Biol. 2022 Aug 3;22(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03736-0.