Mashima Rie, Yamagishi Toshio, Macy Michael
Graduate School of Letters, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810.
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2004 Oct;75(4):308-15. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.75.308.
American and Japanese students, 44 and 38, respectively, participated in an experiment, and played a game together in seven- or eight-person groups. The game was a repeated version of bilateral trust game: Prisoner's Dilemma (PD) with choice of dependence. In no-information condition, participants were not told that some of the group members were from another country. In information condition, they were told that about half of the members were Japanese and the rest were Americans. We examined whether or not people trusted ingroup members (those from the same country) more than outgroup members, and whether or not they cooperated with ingroup members more than outgroup members. We found no evidence of ingroup bias in terms of trust and cooperation, and we did not find significant differences in the levels of trust or cooperation between those found among Americans and those among Japanese. On the other hand, it was found that American participants were more sensitive than Japanese counterparts, to information regarding the past trust behavior of other players when they were deciding whom they trust and whether or not they reciprocate another's trust.
分别有44名美国学生和38名日本学生参与了一项实验,他们以七八人一组的形式一起玩游戏。该游戏是双边信任博弈的重复版本:带有依赖选择的囚徒困境(PD)。在无信息条件下,参与者未被告知部分小组成员来自另一个国家。在有信息条件下,他们被告知大约一半成员是日本人,其余是美国人。我们研究了人们是否比对外群体成员更信任内群体成员(来自同一国家的人),以及他们是否比对外群体成员更多地与内群体成员合作。我们没有发现信任和合作方面存在内群体偏见的证据,并且我们也没有发现美国人和日本人之间在信任或合作水平上存在显著差异。另一方面,研究发现,在决定信任谁以及是否回报他人的信任时,美国参与者比日本参与者对其他玩家过去的信任行为信息更为敏感。