Suppr超能文献

[冲突情境中的现状偏见]

[Status quo bias in conflict situations].

作者信息

Okuda Hidetaka

机构信息

Department of Mass Communications, Faculty of Arts and Literature, Seijo University, Seijo, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 157-8511.

出版信息

Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2004 Oct;75(4):316-23. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.75.316.

Abstract

The present study examined status quo bias in hypothetical conflict situations. Based on Lewin's (1935) typology, four situations were described: approach, avoidant, ambivalent, and no information conflicts. In Study 1 in which 15 male and 68 female undergraduates participated, status quo bias was found in their responses to no information as well as avoidant conflict situations. In Study 2, 29 male and 99 female undergraduates performed decision tasks, and status quo bias was found in ambivalent as well as avoidant conflict situations. In addition, in Study 3, with 25 male and 75 female undergraduates, status quo bias was found in no information, avoidant, and ambivalent conflict situations. In general, strong status quo bias was found in no information as well as avoidant conflict conditions, whereas it was consistently absent in approach conflict situation. These results suggest that status quo bias is a strategy to avoid decisions.

摘要

本研究考察了假设冲突情境中的现状偏差。基于勒温(1935年)的类型学,描述了四种情境:趋近型、回避型、矛盾型和无信息冲突。在有15名男性和68名女性本科生参与的研究1中,发现他们在对无信息以及回避型冲突情境的反应中存在现状偏差。在研究2中,29名男性和99名女性本科生执行决策任务,在矛盾型以及回避型冲突情境中发现了现状偏差。此外,在研究3中,有25名男性和75名女性本科生,在无信息、回避型和矛盾型冲突情境中发现了现状偏差。总体而言,在无信息以及回避型冲突条件下发现了强烈的现状偏差,而在趋近型冲突情境中则一直不存在。这些结果表明,现状偏差是一种避免决策的策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验