Rokni Shahin, Todescan Reynaldo, Watson Philip, Pharoah Michael, Adegbembo Albert O, Deporter Douglas
Department of Prosthodontics, Mashhad Dental School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Jan-Feb;20(1):69-76.
Implant length, implant surface area, and crown-to-root (c/r) ratio and their relationship to crestal bone levels were analyzed in 2 groups of partially edentulous patients treated with sintered porous-surfaced dental implants.
One hundred ninety-nine implants were used to restore 74 partially edentulous patients with fixed prostheses. Implants were categorized according to their length ("short" versus "long") and estimated surface area ("small" versus "large"). "Short" implants had lengths of 5 or 7 mm, while "long" implants were either 9 or 12 mm in length. "Small" implants had estimated surface areas of < or = 600 mm2, while "large" implants had estimated surface areas > 600 mm2. Other data collected included c/r ratio (measured on articulated diagnostic casts), whether or not the implants were splinted, and standardized sequential radiographs.
The mean c/r ratio was 1.5 (SD = 0.4; range 0.8 to 3.0), with 78.9% of the implants having a c/r ratio between 1.1 and 2.0. Neither c/r ratio nor estimated implant surface area (small or large) affected steady-state crestal bone levels. However, implant length and whether the implants were splinted did appear to affect bone levels. Long implants had greater crestal bone loss (0.2 mm more) than short implants; splinted implants showed greater crestal bone loss (0.2 mm more) than nonsplinted ones. These differences were statistically significant.
Sintered porous-surfaced implants performed well in short lengths (7 mm or less) in this series of partially edentulous patients. The data suggested that long implants and/or splinting can result in greater crestal bone loss; longer implants and splinted implants appeared to favor greater crestal bone loss in this investigation. These conclusions are, of course, specific to the implants used and would not be relevant to other implant types.
分析两组接受烧结多孔表面牙种植体治疗的部分牙列缺损患者的种植体长度、种植体表面积、冠根比(c/r)及其与牙槽嵴顶骨水平的关系。
使用199颗种植体为74例部分牙列缺损患者修复固定义齿。种植体根据其长度(“短”与“长”)和估计表面积(“小”与“大”)进行分类。“短”种植体长度为5或7毫米,而“长”种植体长度为9或12毫米。“小”种植体估计表面积≤600平方毫米,而“大”种植体估计表面积>600平方毫米。收集的其他数据包括c/r比(在咬合诊断模型上测量)、种植体是否进行了夹板固定以及标准化的序列X线片。
平均c/r比为1.5(标准差=0.4;范围0.8至3.0),78.9%的种植体c/r比在1.1至2.0之间。c/r比和估计的种植体表面积(小或大)均未影响稳态牙槽嵴顶骨水平。然而,种植体长度和种植体是否进行夹板固定似乎确实会影响骨水平。长种植体的牙槽嵴顶骨吸收比短种植体多(多0.2毫米);夹板固定的种植体比未夹板固定的种植体牙槽嵴顶骨吸收多(多0.2毫米)。这些差异具有统计学意义。
在这组部分牙列缺损患者中,烧结多孔表面种植体在短长度(7毫米或更短)时表现良好。数据表明,长种植体和/或夹板固定会导致更多的牙槽嵴顶骨吸收;在本研究中,较长的种植体和夹板固定的种植体似乎更易导致更多的牙槽嵴顶骨吸收。当然,这些结论特定于所使用的种植体,不适用于其他种植体类型。