• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者不适感:舌侧与唇侧固定矫治器的比较

Patient discomfort: a comparison between lingual and labial fixed appliances.

作者信息

Caniklioglu Cem, Oztürk Yildiz

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2005 Jan;75(1):86-91. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0086:PDACBL>2.0.CO;2.

DOI:10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0086:PDACBL>2.0.CO;2
PMID:15747820
Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine the discomfort differences between patients treated with lingual and labial orthodontic brackets. The study sample consisted of two groups of 30 adolescent patients. Group LI was treated with lingual appliances, and group LA was treated with labial appliances. After three months of treatment, each patient completed a seven-part survey with 12 questions, evaluating intraoral discomfort; tongue-lip-cheek soreness; eating, speech, and oral care difficulties; adaptation period; and general problems. In the LI group, tongue soreness and speech difficulties were significantly greater (P < .001) than in the LA group, whereas cheek (P < .001) and lip (P < .05) soreness were greater in group LA than in group LI. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in reported intraoral discomfort and eating and oral care difficulties, but adhering of food particles was greater (P < .05) in the LI group. In this study, speech difficulty was the most severe problem for the lingual group. All patients in the LA group and 76.7% of the patients in the LI group reported that the problem was solved at the end of 30 days. However, 23.3% of the LI group claimed that at the end of three months they were still having a problem while speaking. Even the maximum adaptation period was longer in the LI group (90 days) than in the LA group (30 days). General evaluation of this study suggested that after the initial discomfort period, only a small percentage (10%) of lingual orthodontic patients reported some hindrance because of their treatment.

摘要

本研究旨在确定使用舌侧正畸托槽和唇侧正畸托槽治疗的患者之间的不适差异。研究样本由两组各30名青少年患者组成。LI组采用舌侧矫治器治疗,LA组采用唇侧矫治器治疗。治疗三个月后,每位患者完成了一项包含12个问题的七部分调查问卷,评估口腔内不适、舌-唇-颊部酸痛、进食、说话及口腔护理困难、适应期和一般问题。在LI组中,舌部酸痛和说话困难显著高于LA组(P <.001),而LA组的颊部(P <.001)和唇部(P <.05)酸痛比LI组更严重。两组在报告的口腔内不适以及进食和口腔护理困难方面未发现统计学上的显著差异,但LI组食物颗粒附着情况更严重(P <.05)。在本研究中,说话困难是舌侧矫治组最严重的问题。LA组所有患者以及LI组76.7%的患者报告称该问题在30天结束时得到解决。然而,LI组23.3%的患者称在三个月结束时说话仍有问题。甚至LI组的最长适应期(90天)也比LA组(30天)更长。本研究的总体评估表明,在最初的不适期过后,只有一小部分(10%)舌侧正畸患者报告因其治疗存在一些障碍。

相似文献

1
Patient discomfort: a comparison between lingual and labial fixed appliances.患者不适感:舌侧与唇侧固定矫治器的比较
Angle Orthod. 2005 Jan;75(1):86-91. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0086:PDACBL>2.0.CO;2.
2
A comparison of pain experienced by patients treated with labial and lingual orthodontic appliances.使用唇侧和舌侧正畸矫治器治疗的患者所经历疼痛的比较。
Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2008 Jun;19:176-8.
3
Comparison of oral impacts experienced by patients treated with labial or customized lingual fixed orthodontic appliances.唇侧和个性化舌侧固定矫治器治疗患者的口腔影响比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jun;139(6):784-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.027.
4
Comparison of the effect on oral discomfort of two positioning techniques with lingual brackets.
Angle Orthod. 2004 Apr;74(2):226-33. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0226:COTEOO>2.0.CO;2.
5
Discomfort caused by bonded lingual orthodontic appliances in adult patients as examined by retrospective questionnaire.通过回顾性问卷调查研究成年患者中舌侧固定正畸矫治器引起的不适。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Jan;115(1):83-8. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70320-3.
6
A comparison of pain experienced by patients treated with labial and lingual orthodontic appliances.唇侧和舌侧矫正器治疗的患者的疼痛比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Aug;32(4):403-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp117. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
7
Influence of palatal expanders on oral comfort, speech, and mastication.腭扩张器对上颚舒适度、言语和咀嚼的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jan;137(1):48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.023.
8
Lingual orthodontic treatment: what is the current evidence base?舌侧正畸治疗:当前的证据基础是什么?
J Orthod. 2013 Sep;40 Suppl 1:S27-33. doi: 10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000073.
9
Adult patients' adjustability to orthodontic appliances. Part I: a comparison between Labial, Lingual, and Invisalign™.成人患者对正畸矫治器的适应性。第一部分:唇侧、舌侧和 Invisalign™ 的比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Dec;34(6):724-30. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr086. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
10
Comparison of the initial orthodontic force systems produced by a new lingual bracket system and a straight-wire appliance.一种新型舌侧矫治器系统与直丝弓矫治器产生的初始正畸力系统的比较。
J Orofac Orthop. 2005 Sep;66(5):363-76. doi: 10.1007/s00056-005-0442-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain Perception of Patients Being Treated with Labial Fixed Appliance versus Lingual Fixed Appliance: A Comparative Study.唇侧固定矫治器与舌侧固定矫治器治疗患者的疼痛感知:一项比较研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1740-S1742. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_295_25. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
Comparison of functional impairments and discomfort with bonded labial and lingual orthodontic appliances - a questionnaire survey.比较唇侧和舌侧粘接式正畸矫治器的功能障碍和不适:问卷调查。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1272. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05041-8.
3
Percentage of patients shifting to another treatment modality: An experience-guided decision.
患者转向另一种治疗方式的比例:基于经验的决策。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Mar 29;29(1):e2423133. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.1.e2423133.oar. eCollection 2024.
4
Safe and Ultraconservative Rehabilitation of Worn Teeth Patients: How Sectional Clear Aligners May Enhance the Prosthetic Treatment Plan.磨损牙齿患者的安全与超保守康复:分段透明矫治器如何优化修复治疗方案
Case Rep Dent. 2022 Oct 30;2022:8305893. doi: 10.1155/2022/8305893. eCollection 2022.
5
Evaluation of the C-lingual Retractor and the Conventional Lingual Orthodontic Brackets in Terms of Speech Performance and Oral Discomfort: A Randomized Controlled Trial.C型舌侧牵开器与传统舌侧正畸托槽在言语功能和口腔不适方面的评估:一项随机对照试验。
Cureus. 2022 Apr 2;14(4):e23752. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23752. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Evaluation of the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in Patients Undergoing Lingual Versus Labial Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.舌侧与唇侧固定正畸矫治器治疗患者口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的评估:一项随机对照临床试验。
Cureus. 2022 Mar 22;14(3):e23379. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23379. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Evaluation of self-perceived pain and jaw function impairment in children undergoing slow and rapid maxillary expansion.评价儿童在慢速和快速上颌扩张过程中的自我感知疼痛和颌功能障碍。
Angle Orthod. 2021 Nov 1;91(6):725-732. doi: 10.2319/020221-100.1.
8
Comparative Analysis of Periodontal Pain According to the Type of Precision Orthodontic Appliances: Vestibular, Lingual and Aligners. A Prospective Clinical Study.根据精密正畸矫治器类型(前庭型、舌侧型和隐形矫治器)对牙周疼痛的比较分析:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Biology (Basel). 2021 Apr 28;10(5):379. doi: 10.3390/biology10050379.
9
The effect of vestibular, lingual, and aligner appliances on the quality of life of adult patients during the initial stages of orthodontic treatment.前庭、舌侧和矫正器对正畸治疗初期成年患者生活质量的影响。
Prog Orthod. 2021 Jan 18;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00346-0.
10
Pain and Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life in Orthodontic Patients During Initial Therapy with Conventional, Low-Friction, and Lingual Brackets and Aligners (Invisalign): A Prospective Clinical Study.传统矫治器、低摩擦矫治器、舌侧矫治器以及隐适美矫治器初始治疗阶段正畸患者的疼痛及口腔健康相关生活质量:一项前瞻性临床研究
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 3;9(7):2088. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072088.