Department of Orthodontics, European University College, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
, Durban, South Africa.
Prog Orthod. 2021 Jan 18;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00346-0.
Patient quality of life (QoL) during orthodontic treatment is an important consideration that requires greater academic investigation as greater focus is placed on enhancing patient experience. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed in three orthodontic appliance groups, i.e., vestibular, lingual, and aligners during the initial stages of treatment. The sample was comprised of 117 adult patient-subjects distributed into 3 groups: vestibular (n = 41), lingual (n = 37), and aligner (n = 39). A WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire surveyed four domains (physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment).
Mean scores for domain 1, physical health, showed that the aligner group (28.1) had significantly greater scores than that of the vestibular (22.7) or lingual (22) groups. Domain 2, psychological health, demonstrated significant differences (P < 0.001) between all groups, with the aligner group scoring the highest (23.2), followed by the lingual (18.4) and vestibular (15.2) groups. Domain 3, social relationship, showed that aligner (10.9) and lingual (10.2) scores were significantly greater (P < 0.001) than those of the vestibular group (7.8). Domain 4, environment, displayed significant differences between all groups, with the aligner group scoring highest (32.1), followed by the lingual group (29.3), and lastly the vestibular group (26.4). Overall, the highest mean score was obtained by the aligner group (23.1) and the lowest mean score was by the vestibular group (18). The mean domain scores for all three groups were significantly different (P ≤ 0.005) from each other (Table 2).
Overall, patients undergoing Aligner therapy reported the overall highest QoL scores, followed by lingual and vestibular groups.
患者在正畸治疗过程中的生活质量(QoL)是一个重要的考虑因素,需要进行更多的学术研究,因为人们越来越关注提高患者体验。在治疗的初始阶段,对三种正畸矫治器组(颊侧、舌侧和隐形矫治器)的生活质量(QoL)进行了评估。样本包括 117 名成年患者,分为 3 组:颊侧组(n = 41)、舌侧组(n = 37)和隐形矫治器组(n = 39)。采用 WHOQOL-BREF 问卷调查了四个领域(身体健康、心理健康、社会关系和环境)。
在身体领域,1 分均值显示,隐形矫治器组(28.1)的得分显著高于颊侧组(22.7)和舌侧组(22)。在心理领域,所有组之间均存在显著差异(P < 0.001),隐形矫治器组得分最高(23.2),其次是舌侧组(18.4)和颊侧组(15.2)。在社会关系领域,隐形矫治器组(10.9)和舌侧组(10.2)的得分显著高于颊侧组(7.8)。在环境领域,所有组之间均存在显著差异,隐形矫治器组得分最高(32.1),其次是舌侧组(29.3),最后是颊侧组(26.4)。总体而言,隐形矫治器组的平均得分最高(23.1),颊侧组的平均得分最低(18)。所有三组的平均领域得分均显著不同(P ≤ 0.005)(表 2)。
总体而言,接受隐形矫治器治疗的患者报告的整体生活质量评分最高,其次是舌侧和颊侧组。