Doocy Shannon, Teferra Shimeles, Norell Dan, Burnham Gilbert
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Suite E8132, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2005 May;60(10):2371-82. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.025. Epub 2005 Jan 8.
This paper presents findings of a survey that was primarily intended as (1) an assessment of coping capacity in drought and food insecure conditions and (2) a microfinance program outcome study. A three group cross-sectional survey of 819 households was conducted in May 2003 in two predominantly rural sites in Ethiopia. Established clients of the WISDOM Microfinance Institution were compared with similar incoming clients and community controls. No overall pattern of enhanced prevalence of coping mechanisms was observed in any participant group, suggesting that participation in the lending program did not affect coping capacity at the household level. No significant differences in mean mid-upper arm circumference or prevalence of acute malnutrition were found in males or females when the total sample was assessed. In the primary survey site, Sodo, female clients and their children had significantly better nutritional status than other comparison groups: the odds of malnourishment in female community controls compared to established female clients was 3.2 (95% CI: 1.1-9.8) and the odds of acute malnutrition in children 6-59 months of age were 1.6 times greater in children of both male clients and community controls (95% CI: .78-3.32). Household food security among female client households in Sodo was significantly better than in other comparison groups according to a variety of indicators. As compared to female clients, male clients and community controls, respectively, were 1.94 (95% CI: 1.05-3.66) and 2.08 (95% CI: 1.10-4.00) times more likely to have received food aid during the past year. Findings of the present study suggest that microfinance programs may have an important impact on nutritional status and well-being of female clients and their families. That female clients were significantly less likely to be food aid recipients suggests that microfinance programs may be successful in reducing vulnerability to prolonged drought and food insecurity.
本文展示了一项调查的结果,该调查主要旨在:(1)评估干旱和粮食不安全状况下的应对能力;(2)进行一项小额融资项目成果研究。2003年5月,在埃塞俄比亚两个主要为农村地区的地点,对819户家庭进行了三组横断面调查。将智慧小额融资机构的现有客户与类似的新客户及社区对照组进行了比较。在任何参与组中均未观察到应对机制患病率增加的总体模式,这表明参与贷款项目并未影响家庭层面的应对能力。在评估总样本时,男性或女性的上臂中部平均周长或急性营养不良患病率均未发现显著差异。在主要调查地点索多,女性客户及其子女的营养状况明显优于其他对照组:与现有女性客户相比,女性社区对照组营养不良的几率为3.2(95%置信区间:1.1 - 9.8),6至59个月大儿童中,男性客户和社区对照组儿童的急性营养不良几率比女性客户子女高1.6倍(95%置信区间:0.78 - 3.32)。根据各种指标,索多女性客户家庭的粮食安全状况明显优于其他对照组。与女性客户相比,男性客户和社区对照组在过去一年中获得粮食援助的可能性分别高出1.94倍(95%置信区间:1.05 - 3.66)和2.08倍(95%置信区间:1.10 - 4.00)。本研究结果表明,小额融资项目可能对女性客户及其家庭的营养状况和福祉产生重要影响。女性客户成为粮食援助接受者的可能性显著较低,这表明小额融资项目可能成功降低了长期干旱和粮食不安全的脆弱性。