• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经行为筛查数据分析:连续结果的剂量-时间-反应建模

Analyses of neurobehavioral screening data: dose-time-response modeling of continuous outcomes.

作者信息

Zhu Yiliang, Wessel Michael R, Liu Tiebin, Moser Virginia C

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Apr;41(3):240-55. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.12.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.12.005
PMID:15748798
Abstract

Neurotoxic effects are a non-cancer endpoint for health risk, and neurobehavioral screening tests can serve as a first tier investigation of neurotoxicity [US EPA, Federal Register 63 (1998) 26926]. Analysis of neurobehavioral screening data such as those of the functional observational battery (FOB) traditionally relies on analysis of variance (ANOVA). ANOVA is designed to detect whether there are dose-effects, but does not model the underlying dose-response relationship and subsequent risk assessment fails to utilize the shape of the underlying dose-response. In contrast, dose-response modeling interpolates toxic effects between experimental points, and permits prediction of toxic effects within the experimental range. Additionally it is also a prerequisite for estimating a benchmark dose. This paper discusses dose-time-response modeling of longitudinal neurotoxicity data and illustrates the methods using three continuous FOB outcomes from an EPA study involving acute exposure to triethyltin (TET). Several mathematical functions are presented as candidate dose-time-response models. The use of random effects is discussed to characterize inter-subject variation. The results indicate that it is feasible to use simple mathematical functions to model empirical dose-time-response observed in existing longitudinal neurotoxicological data. Further research is needed on the types of design and data required to reliably approximate the true underlying dose-time-response.

摘要

神经毒性效应是健康风险的非癌症终点,神经行为筛查测试可作为神经毒性的一级调查手段[美国环境保护局,《联邦公报》63 (1998) 26926]。传统上,对诸如功能性观察组合(FOB)等神经行为筛查数据的分析依赖于方差分析(ANOVA)。方差分析旨在检测是否存在剂量效应,但并未对潜在的剂量反应关系进行建模,因此后续的风险评估无法利用潜在剂量反应的形态。相比之下,剂量反应建模可在实验点之间内插毒性效应,并允许在实验范围内预测毒性效应。此外,它也是估计基准剂量的先决条件。本文讨论了纵向神经毒性数据的剂量 - 时间反应建模,并使用美国环境保护局一项涉及急性暴露于三乙基锡(TET)的研究中的三个连续FOB结果来说明这些方法。提出了几种数学函数作为候选剂量 - 时间反应模型。讨论了使用随机效应来表征个体间差异。结果表明,使用简单的数学函数对现有纵向神经毒理学数据中观察到的经验性剂量 - 时间反应进行建模是可行的。对于可靠地近似真实潜在剂量 - 时间反应所需的设计和数据类型,还需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Analyses of neurobehavioral screening data: dose-time-response modeling of continuous outcomes.神经行为筛查数据分析:连续结果的剂量-时间-反应建模
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Apr;41(3):240-55. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.12.005.
2
A probabilistic framework for non-cancer risk assessment.非癌症风险评估的概率框架。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007 Jun;48(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.10.008. Epub 2006 Dec 12.
3
Evolution and current status of neurotoxicity risk assessment.神经毒性风险评估的演变与现状
Drug Metab Rev. 1996 Feb-May;28(1-2):121-39. doi: 10.3109/03602539608993995.
4
From neurotoxic to chemosensory effects: new insights on acute solvent neurotoxicity exemplified by acute effects of 2-ethylhexanol.从神经毒性到化学感觉效应:以2-乙基己醇的急性效应为例对急性溶剂神经毒性的新见解。
Neurotoxicology. 2007 Mar;28(2):347-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.03.008. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
5
Acrylamide: review of toxicity data and dose-response analyses for cancer and noncancer effects.丙烯酰胺:癌症和非癌症效应的毒性数据综述及剂量反应分析
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2006 Jul-Aug;36(6-7):481-608. doi: 10.1080/10408440600851377.
6
A practical guide to dose-response analyses and risk assessment in occupational epidemiology.职业流行病学中剂量反应分析与风险评估实用指南。
Epidemiology. 2004 Jan;15(1):63-70. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000100287.45004.e7.
7
The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: VI. Agreement and reliability of the data.国际化学品安全规划署神经行为筛查方法合作研究:六、数据的一致性和可靠性
Neurotoxicology. 1997;18(4):1057-64.
8
PBPK models in risk assessment--A focus on chloroprene.风险评估中的生理药代动力学(PBPK)模型——以氯丁二烯为重点
Chem Biol Interact. 2007 Mar 20;166(1-3):352-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2007.01.016. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
9
A new model function for continuous data sets in health risk assessment of chemicals using the benchmark dose concept.一种使用基准剂量概念对化学品健康风险评估中的连续数据集进行建模的新函数。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1998 Apr;27(2):98-107. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1997.1184.
10
Analyses of neurobehavioral screening data: benchmark dose estimation.神经行为筛查数据的分析:基准剂量估计
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Jul;42(2):190-201. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.03.007.