Saidi Abdelkader, Bocqueraz Frédéric, Descotes Jean-Luc, Cadi Pierre, Terrier Nicolas, Boillot Bernard, Rambeaud Jean-Jacques
Service d'Urologie et de la Transplantation rénale, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Grenoble, France.
Prog Urol. 2004 Dec;14(6):1125-31.
The objective of this study is to assess the results of our therapeutic management of blunt kidney trauma in patients hospitalised over the last 10 years.
From January 1993 to January 2003, 105 patients were hospitalised in our department for blunt kidney trauma. We retrospectively studied age, gender, injured side, mechanism of trauma (direct, indirect or deceleration), aetiology, presence of associated lesions (visceral, orthopaedic), and clinical and laboratory signs on admission (haematuria, blood pressure, haemoglobin and serum creatinine). The grade of the lesions was defined by radiological assessment, specifying the presence or absence of devascularized fragments and urine extravasation. All complications were noted and studied according to the initial therapeutic management and grade. Follow-up was clinical (BP and search for renal pain) and radiological (CT and/or DMSA scan).
105 cases of blunt trauma of the kidney were hospitalised between January 1993 and January 2003 in our department. The mean age of the patients was 28.7 years (range: 7-75 years). Trauma was classified into 5 grades on the basis of the radiological assessment according to the ASST (American Society of Surgery of Trauma): 51 (49%) cases of grade 1 (n = 26) and grade 2 (n = 25) trauma, and 54 (51%) cases of major grade 3 to 5 trauma: 17 grade 3 (16%), 28 grade 4 (27%) and 9 grade 5 (8%) were diagnosed. Among the cases of major trauma, 7 (13%) were operated urgently during the first 24 hours: 4 cases of grade 5 trauma with renal artery dissection and 3 cases of grade 4 trauma with immediate uncontrolled bleeding. The nephrectomy rate (partial and total), when major renal trauma (grade 3, 4 and 5) (n = 47) was managed conservatively was 23% (11 nephrectomies) with the loss of 9.5 renal units (20%); this rate was 57% for grade 4 trauma presenting urine extravasation and devascularized fragments (n = 14). Twelve patients (7 with grade 4 trauma and 5 with grade 3 trauma) were reviewed by DMSA scintigraphy with a mean follow-up of 63 months (range: 26-108 months). Traumatized kidneys presented a mean function of 41.8% (range: 26.4-50%).
Blunt kidney trauma is usually managed conservatively. The development of interventional radiology, endourological drainage techniques and medical intensive care helps to maintain this attitude by decreasing the need for surgery, even in the most severe trauma.
本研究的目的是评估过去10年中我院收治的钝性肾损伤患者的治疗效果。
1993年1月至2003年1月,105例钝性肾损伤患者入住我院。我们回顾性研究了患者的年龄、性别、受伤侧、创伤机制(直接、间接或减速)、病因、合并损伤(内脏、骨科)以及入院时的临床和实验室指标(血尿、血压、血红蛋白和血清肌酐)。损伤程度通过影像学评估确定,明确有无血管离断碎片和尿外渗。记录所有并发症,并根据初始治疗方法和损伤程度进行研究。随访包括临床(血压和肾区疼痛检查)和影像学(CT和/或二巯基丁二酸扫描)。
1993年1月至2003年1月,我院收治了105例钝性肾损伤患者。患者的平均年龄为28.7岁(范围:7 - 75岁)。根据美国创伤外科协会(ASST)的影像学评估,创伤分为5级:1级(n = 26)和2级(n = 25)创伤51例(49%),3至5级重度创伤54例(51%):诊断为17例3级(16%)、28例4级(27%)和9例5级(8%)。在重度创伤病例中,7例(13%)在最初24小时内紧急手术:4例5级创伤伴肾动脉夹层,3例4级创伤伴立即无法控制的出血。对重度肾损伤(3、4和5级)(n = 47)进行保守治疗时,肾切除率(部分和全肾切除)为23%(11例肾切除),损失9.5个肾单位(20%);4级创伤出现尿外渗和血管离断碎片(n = 14)时,肾切除率为57%。12例患者(7例4级创伤和5例3级创伤)接受了二巯基丁二酸闪烁扫描复查,平均随访63个月(范围:26 - 108个月)。受伤肾脏的平均功能为41.8%(范围:26.4 - 50%)。
钝性肾损伤通常采用保守治疗。介入放射学、腔内泌尿外科引流技术和医疗重症监护的发展有助于维持这种治疗方式,减少手术需求,即使在最严重的创伤中也是如此。