Uwaifo Gabriel I, Ratner Robert E
Georgetown University College of Medicine, Washington DC 20003, USA.
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2005 Mar;34(1):155-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2004.11.006.
After many decades of relative therapeutic stagnation since the initial discovery of insulin, followed by some modifications on its structure and only having sulfonylureas and biguanides for many years, the last decade has seen a surge in new therapeutic options for the management of diabetes. The results of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study and Kumamoto study indicate the need for aggressive glycemic control and the slow inexorable clinical deterioration associated with type 2 diabetes overtime. The propensity for weight gain and hypoglycemia are the two major limitations that subcutaneous insulin and sulfonylureas have been particularly prone to. The newer antidiabetic medications and those on the horizon attempt to address these limitations. GLP-1 agonists and the DPP-IV inhibitors exploit the innate incretin system to improve glycemia while promoting satiety and weight management. Like GLP-1 related compounds, pramlintide offers the potential to address postprandial hyperglucagonemia associated with type 2 diabetes only limited by the multiple injections and gastrointestinal side effects. The glitazars offer the hope ofa new approach to diabetes care addressing not just glycemia, but dyslipidemia and other components of the metabolic syndrome, though the side effect profile remains a major unknown. The INGAP peptide represents the holy grail of diabetes care as it offers the potential of a new paradigm: that of islet regeneration and potential for a cure. But at this stage, with no human data available, it remains highly speculative. Beyond these and other novel agents being developed to meet the challenge of the worldwide epidemic of diabetes, the central place of insulin in diabetes care cannot be forgotten. In view of this the continued efforts of improvement in insulin delivery, kinetics and action have spurred such innovations as the various inhaled insulins and new insulin analogues. There is cause for guarded optimism and excitement about the years ahead. There is reason to expect that despite the growing burden of diabetes worldwide, we will be better equipped to manage it and its comorbidities and prevent its onset and possibly even cure it.
自胰岛素最初被发现后的几十年里,治疗方法相对停滞不前,随后对其结构进行了一些改良,并且多年来仅有磺脲类药物和双胍类药物。而在过去十年中,糖尿病治疗出现了大量新的选择。英国前瞻性糖尿病研究和熊本研究的结果表明,有必要积极控制血糖,以及2型糖尿病随着时间的推移会不可避免地缓慢出现临床恶化。体重增加倾向和低血糖是皮下注射胰岛素和磺脲类药物特别容易出现的两个主要局限性。新型抗糖尿病药物以及即将出现的药物试图解决这些局限性。胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)激动剂和二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-IV)抑制剂利用天然的肠促胰岛素系统来改善血糖水平,同时促进饱腹感和体重管理。与GLP-1相关化合物一样,普兰林肽有可能解决与2型糖尿病相关的餐后高胰高血糖素血症,只是受多次注射和胃肠道副作用的限制。格列酮类药物为糖尿病治疗提供了一种新方法的希望,不仅能解决血糖问题,还能解决血脂异常和代谢综合征的其他方面,尽管副作用情况仍是一个主要未知数。INGAP肽代表了糖尿病治疗的圣杯,因为它提供了一种新范式的潜力:胰岛再生和治愈的潜力。但在现阶段,由于尚无人体数据,这仍然极具推测性。除了为应对全球糖尿病流行挑战而研发的这些及其他新型药物外,胰岛素在糖尿病治疗中的核心地位不可忽视。鉴于此,在胰岛素给药、动力学和作用方面持续改进的努力催生了各种吸入式胰岛素和新型胰岛素类似物等创新成果。对未来几年有理由保持谨慎的乐观和兴奋。有理由期待,尽管全球糖尿病负担不断加重,但我们将有更好的能力来管理糖尿病及其合并症,并预防其发生,甚至有可能治愈它。