Krentz Andrew J, Patel Mayank B, Bailey Clifford J
Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Southampton University Hospitals and University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Drugs. 2008;68(15):2131-62. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868150-00005.
Oral therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus, when used appropriately, can safely assist patients to achieve glycaemic targets in the short to medium term. However, the progressive nature of type 2 diabetes usually requires a combination of two or more oral agents in the longer term, often as a prelude to insulin therapy. Issues of safety and tolerability, notably weight gain, often limit the optimal application of anti-diabetic drugs such as sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones. Moreover, the impact of different drugs, even within a single class, on the risk of long-term vascular complications has come under scrutiny. For example, recent publication of evidence suggesting potential detrimental effects of rosiglitazone on myocardial events generated a heated debate and led to a reduction in use of this drug. In contrast, current evidence supports the view that pioglitazone has vasculoprotective properties. Both drugs are contraindicated in patients who are at risk of heart failure. An additional recently identified safety concern is an increased risk of fractures, especially in postmenopausal women.Several new drugs with glucose-lowering efficacy that may offer certain advantages have recently become available. These include (i) injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors; (ii) the amylin analogue pramlintide; and (iii) selective cannabinoid receptor-1 (CB1) antagonists. GLP-1 receptor agonists, such as exenatide, stimulate nutrient-induced insulin secretion and reduce inappropriate glucagon secretion while delaying gastric emptying and reducing appetite. These agents offer a low risk of hypoglycaemia combined with sustained weight loss. The DPP-4 inhibitors sitagliptin and vildagliptin are generally weight neutral, with less marked gastrointestinal adverse effects than the GLP-1 receptor agonists. Potential benefits of GLP-1 receptor stimulation on beta cell neogenesis are under investigation. Pancreatitis has been reported in exenatide-treated patients. Pramlintide, an injected peptide used in combination with insulin, can reduce insulin dose and bodyweight. The CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant promotes weight loss and has favourable effects on aspects of the metabolic syndrome, including the hyperglycaemia of type 2 diabetes. However, in 2007 the US FDA declined approval of rimonabant, requiring more data on adverse effects, notably depression. The future of dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha/gamma agonists, or glitazars, is presently uncertain following concerns about their safety.In conclusion, several new classes of drugs have recently become available in some countries that offer new options for treating type 2 diabetes. Beneficial or neutral effects on bodyweight are an attractive feature of the new drugs. However, the higher cost of these agents, coupled with an absence of long-term safety and clinical outcome data, need to be taken into consideration by clinicians and healthcare organizations.
2型糖尿病的口服治疗在合理使用时,可在短期至中期安全地帮助患者实现血糖目标。然而,2型糖尿病的渐进性通常需要在长期联合使用两种或更多种口服药物,这往往是胰岛素治疗的前奏。安全性和耐受性问题,尤其是体重增加,常常限制了磺脲类和噻唑烷二酮类等抗糖尿病药物的最佳应用。此外,不同药物(即使在同一类别内)对长期血管并发症风险的影响也受到了审视。例如,最近有证据表明罗格列酮对心肌事件有潜在有害影响,这引发了激烈的争论,并导致该药物的使用减少。相比之下,目前的证据支持吡格列酮具有血管保护特性的观点。这两种药物在有心力衰竭风险的患者中均为禁忌。最近另一个被发现的安全问题是骨折风险增加,尤其是绝经后女性。
几种具有降血糖功效且可能具有某些优势的新药最近已上市。这些药物包括:(i)注射用胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂和口服二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂;(ii)胰淀素类似物普兰林肽;以及(iii)选择性大麻素受体-1(CB1)拮抗剂。GLP-1受体激动剂,如艾塞那肽,可刺激营养物质诱导的胰岛素分泌,减少不适当的胰高血糖素分泌,同时延迟胃排空并降低食欲。这些药物低血糖风险低,还能持续减轻体重。DPP-4抑制剂西他列汀和维格列汀一般对体重无影响,胃肠道不良反应比GLP-1受体激动剂轻。GLP-1受体刺激对β细胞新生的潜在益处正在研究中。使用艾塞那肽治疗的患者曾有胰腺炎的报告。普兰林肽是一种与胰岛素联合使用的注射用肽,可减少胰岛素剂量和体重。CB1受体拮抗剂利莫那班可促进体重减轻,并对代谢综合征的多个方面有有利影响,包括2型糖尿病的高血糖。然而,2007年美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)拒绝批准利莫那班,要求提供更多关于不良反应的数据,尤其是抑郁症方面的数据。由于对其安全性的担忧,双过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体-α/γ激动剂(即格列扎类药物)的未来目前尚不确定。
总之,一些国家最近已有几类新药上市,为2型糖尿病的治疗提供了新的选择。对体重有益或中性的影响是这些新药的一个吸引人的特点。然而,这些药物成本较高,且缺乏长期安全性和临床结局数据,临床医生和医疗机构需要予以考虑。