Mireku-Boateng A O, Jackson Aaron G
Division of Urology, Howard University Hospital, Washington, D.C. 20060, USA.
Urol Int. 2005;74(2):180-2. doi: 10.1159/000083291.
Suprapubic prostatectomy remains a very common surgical treatment for bladder outlet obstruction from an enlarged prostate in the developing world. It is a technically simple procedure which can be learned by nonurologists who perform the bulk of these procedures in the developing world. Intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, however, can be a problem. We describe our experience with prostatic fossa packing at the time of the procedure, as a very simple, quick and effective technique for maximal hemostasis.
We have used this technique for several years at our institution and the results have been excellent. However, the major advantages of this technique became highlighted when the primary author visited Eritrea on a medical mission trip and used it in 42 consecutive cases. We looked at the hemorrhagic complications, both intraoperatively and postoperatively, infections and other complications related to the technique.
The 42 patients were typical of the patients that are seen in the developing world for suprapubic prostatectomy. The age range was 49-102 years. 75% had indwelling urethral catheters secondary to urinary retention. The duration of the catheters was from 2 weeks to 10 months. All the patients who had the indwelling catheters had bacteriuria. 56% had associated bladder calculi and 25% had associated inguinal hernias. The average surgical time was 45 min. The average intraoperative blood loss was estimated at 160 ml. There were no blood transfusions. There were no infections and there were no complications related to the packing.
Packing of the prostatic fossa at the time of enucleation of the adenoma is a very simple, quick and effective way to achieve hemostasis in suprapubic prostatectomy. It is also very easy to learn. With this technique we have achieved zero rate of transfusion and no infections. The surgical time is also reduced. We have had no morbidities associated with this technique and highly recommend it.
耻骨上前列腺切除术仍是发展中国家治疗前列腺增生所致膀胱出口梗阻的一种非常常见的外科治疗方法。这是一种技术上简单的手术,非泌尿外科医生也能学会,而在发展中国家,大部分此类手术都是由他们完成的。然而,术中及术后出血可能是个问题。我们描述了我们在手术时进行前列腺窝填塞的经验,这是一种非常简单、快速且有效的实现最大程度止血的技术。
我们在本院使用该技术数年,效果良好。然而,当第一作者前往厄立特里亚进行医疗任务旅行并连续在42例病例中使用该技术时,该技术的主要优势凸显出来。我们观察了术中及术后的出血并发症、感染以及与该技术相关的其他并发症。
这42例患者是发展中国家接受耻骨上前列腺切除术患者的典型代表。年龄范围为49至102岁。75%的患者因尿潴留留置尿道导管。导管留置时间为2周至10个月。所有留置导管的患者均有菌尿。56%的患者伴有膀胱结石,25%的患者伴有腹股沟疝。平均手术时间为45分钟。术中平均失血量估计为160毫升。无输血情况。无感染,也无与填塞相关的并发症。
在腺瘤剜除时对前列腺窝进行填塞是耻骨上前列腺切除术中实现止血的一种非常简单、快速且有效的方法。它也很容易学。通过该技术,我们实现了零输血率且无感染。手术时间也缩短了。我们未出现与该技术相关任何并发症,强烈推荐使用。