Anger Jennifer Tash, Raj Ganesh V, Delvecchio Fernando C, Webster George D
Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1143-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000155624.48337.a5.
We present a heterogeneous group of men presenting with varying degrees of anastomotic contracture (AC) and associated stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following radical prostatectomy. It is particularly important that AC should be resolved before artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation, because instrumentation through the AUS can risk erosion.
The records of 54 consecutive men who were referred for the management of AC and associated SUI were reviewed. Patient treatment and outcomes were stratified according to their unique characteristics.
A total of 54 patients underwent radical prostatectomy alone (48), or in combination with radiation therapy (7) or cryotherapy (1). In group 1, 35 patients had previously undiscovered AC, or 1 or more prior contracture incisions (CIs) with SUI. CI and AUS were performed simultaneously in 33 patients and sequentially in 2. In group 2, 7 patients with intractable AC following multiple CIs/dilations and self-calibration, or an indwelling urethral or suprapubic catheter underwent simultaneous (3) or sequential (2) CI/AUS or CI only (2). Five patients required temporary self-calibration. In group 3, in 12 patients with total outlet obliteration recanalization was accomplished with combined antegrade/retrograde endoscopy and CI. Ten patients had re-obliteration, of whom 1 underwent suprapubic diversion and 9 underwent repeat recanalization with placement of a UroLume stent (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, Minnesota) across the anastomosis. Eight patients underwent artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement 4 to 6 weeks later and 1 awaits an AUS. Of those implanted with an AUS 2 required repeat endoscopic procedures because of recurrent but manageable stent ingrowth.
Most ACs are treated successfully with simultaneous, aggressive CI/AUS. A history of many CIs or long, dense contractures suggest the need for staged management. In those with obliterated outlets we prefer to reestablish patency and if rapid recurrence develops, we place a UroLume stent. Regardless of a history of radiation therapy, continence is restored with an AUS.
我们呈现了一组前列腺癌根治术后出现不同程度吻合口狭窄(AC)及相关压力性尿失禁(SUI)的男性患者。在植入人工尿道括约肌(AUS)之前解决AC尤为重要,因为通过AUS进行器械操作有侵蚀风险。
回顾了54例因AC及相关SUI前来就诊的连续男性患者的记录。根据其独特特征对患者的治疗及结果进行分层。
共有54例患者单独接受了前列腺癌根治术(48例),或联合放疗(7例)或冷冻治疗(1例)。在第1组中,35例患者之前未发现AC,或有1次或更多次先前的狭窄切开术(CI)及SUI。33例患者同时进行了CI和AUS,2例患者先后进行。在第2组中,7例经多次CI/扩张及自我校准后仍有顽固性AC,或留置尿道或耻骨上导尿管的患者,同时(3例)或先后(2例)进行了CI/AUS或仅进行了CI(2例)。5例患者需要临时自我校准。在第3组中,12例完全尿道出口闭塞的患者通过顺行/逆行联合内镜检查及CI实现了再通。10例患者再次闭塞,其中1例接受了耻骨上改道,9例接受了重复再通,并在吻合口处放置了UroLume支架(美国美敦力公司,明尼苏达州明尼通卡)。8例患者在4至6周后接受了人工尿道括约肌(AUS)植入,1例等待植入AUS。在植入AUS的患者中,2例因支架过度生长复发但可控制而需要重复内镜手术。
大多数AC通过同时进行积极的CI/AUS治疗成功。多次CI病史或长而致密的狭窄提示需要分期处理。对于尿道出口闭塞的患者,我们倾向于重建通畅,如果快速复发,我们会放置UroLume支架。无论有无放疗史,AUS均可恢复控尿功能。