Rhea D J, Lantz C D, Cornelius A E
Department of Kinesiology, Texas Christian University, Ft. Worth, TX 76129, USA.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2004 Dec;44(4):428-35.
The development of the 6-factor, 27-item Muscle Dysmorphia Inventory (MDI) was based on Lantz et al. proposed model of characteristics associated with Muscle Dysmorphia.
quantitative procedures including item-to-total correlations, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and structure equation modeling confirmed the construct validity of the scale. Convergent validity was also tested.
bodybuilding and powerlifting competition venues, weight training facilities, and university athletic venues.
the 1(st) study consisted of 77 experienced male free weight lifters. The 2(nd) study consisted of 156 male non-competitive bodybuilders and weight lifters and 168 elite level powerlifters and bodybuilders. The 3(rd) study consisted of 151 male and female bodybuilders and weight lifters.
each participant completed demographic information, the MDI, Drive for Thinness subscale of the Eating Disorder Inventory, and the Training Dependency subscale of the Bodybuilding Dependence Scale.
Reliability estimates (Cronbach's a) ranged from 0.72 to 0.94. Factor loadings in all 3 studies supported the 6-factor structure (size/symmetry, supplement use, exercise dependence, pharmacological use, dietary behavior, and physique protection). Much of the scale validation was focused on construct validity, however, correlations with the MDI's subscales and the Training Dependency subscale of the Bodybuilding Dependence Scale and the Drive for Thinness subscale of the Eating Disorder Inventory provided evidence of convergent validity also.
From these preliminary results, the MDI appears to contribute to the identification of a newly formed disorder by offering a multi-dimensional measure of factors related to Muscle Dysmorphia.
6因素、27项肌肉畸形症量表(MDI)的编制基于兰茨等人提出的与肌肉畸形症相关的特征模型。
包括项目与总分相关性、探索性和验证性因素分析以及结构方程建模在内的定量程序证实了该量表的结构效度。同时也测试了收敛效度。
健美和力量举比赛场馆、重量训练设施以及大学体育场馆。
第一项研究包括77名有经验的男性自由重量训练者。第二项研究包括156名非竞技男性健美运动员和举重运动员以及168名精英级力量举运动员和健美运动员。第三项研究包括151名男性和女性健美运动员及举重运动员。
每位参与者完成人口统计学信息、MDI、饮食失调量表的瘦身驱力分量表以及健美依赖量表的训练依赖分量表。
信度估计值(克朗巴哈系数)在0.72至0.94之间。所有三项研究中的因素负荷均支持6因素结构(体型/对称性、补充剂使用、运动依赖、药物使用、饮食行为和体格保护)。然而,量表验证大多集中在结构效度上,不过,MDI各分量表与健美依赖量表的训练依赖分量表以及饮食失调量表的瘦身驱力分量表之间的相关性也提供了收敛效度的证据。
从这些初步结果来看,MDI似乎有助于通过提供与肌肉畸形症相关因素的多维测量来识别一种新形成的病症。