You Jing, Zhuang Lin, Cheng Hong-Ying, Yan Shou-Ming, Qiao Yan-Wei, Huang Jun-Hua, Tang Bao-Zhang, Ma Yong-Liang, Wu Guo-Bing, Qu Jun-Yan, Wu Rong-Xue
Department of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical College, Yunnan Province, China.
J Chin Med Assoc. 2005 Feb;68(2):65-72. doi: 10.1016/s1726-4901(09)70137-6.
This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of thymosin-alphal (T-alpha1) with that of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in patients with chronic hepatitis B who were positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and hepatitis B envelope antibody (anti-HBe).
Fifty-six patients were randomly divided into groups A and B. Both groups were comparable (p > 0.05) at baseline regarding age, sex, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. Group A patients received T-alpha1 1.6 mg subcutaneously twice weekly, while group B patients received IFN-alpha 5 million IU daily for 15 days, then thrice weekly for 6 months. Results from the 2 groups were compared with data from a group of 30 patients never treated with IFN-alpha and who were followed-up for 12 months (historical control [HC] group); the 3 groups were comparable (p > 0.05).
After treatment, a complete response (ALT normalization and HBV DNA loss) occurred in 8 of 26 patients in group A (30.8%) and 14 of 30 in group B (46.7%; chi2 = 1.476, p = 0.224). After a follow-up period of 6 months, a complete response was observed in 11 of 26 patients in group A (42.3%) and 7 of 30 in group B (23.3%; chi2 = 2.299, p = 0.129). The rate of complete response was significantly greater in the IFN-alpha than HC group at the end of therapy (46.7% vs 3.3%; chi2 = 15.022, p = 0.0001), and in the T-alphal than HC group at the end of follow-up (42.3% vs 3.3%; chi2 = 12.566, p = 0.0001). Ten of the 12 T-alphal responders (i.e. partial responders; 83.3%) experienced sustained, non-detectable HBV DNA after 6 months' treatment; 6 of the 14 T-alphal non-responders (42.9%) showed a delayed response of non-detectable HBV DNA during the follow-up period. Corresponding values for group B patients were 50% (9/18) and 0% (0/12). The rate of delayed response was significantly higher in group A than the other 2 groups (chi2 = 6.686, p = 0.010; chi2 = 4.964, p = 0.038), whereas the rate of flare was higher in group B than in the other 2 groups (chi2 = 3.445, p = 0.063; chi2 = 7.668, p = 0.006), during the follow-up period. Unlike IFN-alpha, T-alphal was well tolerated, i.e. no adverse effects were noted in group A.
These results suggest that a 6-month course of T-alpha1 therapy is effective and safe in patients with anti-HBe-positive chronic hepatitis B; T-alpha1 can reduce HBV replication in such patients. Compared with IFN-alpha, T-alpha1 is better tolerated and seems to induce a gradual and more sustained normalization of ALT and loss of HBV DNA. Combination therapy with T-alpha1 and IFN-alpha or nucleoside analogs for hepatitis B warrants further study.
本研究旨在比较α1胸腺素(T-α1)与α干扰素(IFN-α)对乙肝病毒(HBV)DNA和乙肝e抗体(抗-HBe)阳性的慢性乙型肝炎患者的疗效和安全性。
56例患者随机分为A组和B组。两组在年龄、性别和丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)水平方面基线可比(p>0.05)。A组患者每周两次皮下注射1.6mg T-α1,而B组患者每天接受500万IU IFN-α治疗15天,然后每周三次治疗6个月。将两组结果与一组30例未接受IFN-α治疗且随访12个月的患者(历史对照[HC]组)的数据进行比较;三组可比(p>0.05)。
治疗后,A组26例患者中有8例(30.8%)出现完全应答(ALT正常化和HBV DNA消失),B组30例中有14例(46.7%);χ2=1.476,p=0.224。随访6个月后,A组26例患者中有11例(42.3%)出现完全应答,B组30例中有7例(23.3%);χ2=2.299,p=0.129。治疗结束时,IFN-α组的完全应答率显著高于HC组(46.7%对3.3%;χ2=15.022,p=0.0001),随访结束时T-α1组高于HC组(42.3%对3.3%;χ2=12.566,p=0.0001)。12例T-α1应答者中有10例(即部分应答者;83.3%)在治疗6个月后出现持续的、检测不到的HBV DNA;14例T-α1无应答者中有6例(42.9%)在随访期间出现延迟应答,HBV DNA检测不到。B组患者的相应值为50%(9/18)和0%(0/12)。随访期间,A组的延迟应答率显著高于其他两组(χ2=6.686,p=0.010;χ2=4.964,p=0.038),而B组的病情突然加重率高于其他两组(χ2=3.445,p=0.063;χ2=7.668,p=0.006)。与IFN-α不同,T-α1耐受性良好,即A组未观察到不良反应。
这些结果表明,6个月疗程的T-α1治疗对抗-HBe阳性的慢性乙型肝炎患者有效且安全;T-α1可降低此类患者的HBV复制。与IFN-α相比,T-α1耐受性更好,似乎能使ALT逐渐且更持续地正常化,并使HBV DNA消失。T-α1与IFN-α或核苷类似物联合治疗乙型肝炎值得进一步研究。