Wolyniak Christopher J, Sacks Gavin L, Pan Bruce S, Brenna J Thomas
Division of Nutritional Sciences, Savage Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Anal Chem. 2005 Mar 15;77(6):1746-52. doi: 10.1021/ac048524v.
Recent advances in gas chromatography combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GCC-IRMS) has made compound-specific isotope analysis routine, but reports on position-specific isotopic analysis are still scarce. On-line GC-pyrolysis (Py) coupled to GCC-IRMS is reported here for isolation and isotopic characterization of alaninol and phenethylamine, analogues of alanine and phenylalanine, respectively. Ideally, pyrolytic fragments will originate from unique sites within the parent molecule, and isotope ratios for each position within the parent can either be measured directly or calculated from fragment isotope ratios without substantially degrading the analytical precision. Alaninol pyrolysis yielded several fragments, of which CO and CH4 were used for isotope ratio calculations. Isotope labeling experiments showed that CO derived entirely from the C(1) position, while all three positions of alaninol contributed to CH4 (29.0 +/- 0.3% from C(1), 3.6 +/- 0.2% from C(2), and 66.9 +/- 1.1% from C(3)). We demonstrate iterative use of mass balance to calculate isotope ratios from all positions despite the nonideal positional fidelity of CH4. Pyrolysis of phenethylamine generated benzene and toluene fragments. Benzene derived entirely from C(ring), and toluene was proportionately formed from C(3) and C(ring). Relative intramolecular isotope ratios (Deltadelta13C) were calculated directly from delta13C of fragments or indirectly by mass balance. Though the C(3) isotope ratio was calculated from the benzene and toluene fragments, propagation of errors showed that the final precision of the determination was degraded due to the small contribution that C(3) makes to toluene. Samples of each amino acid from four different vendors showed natural variability between sources, especially at the C(1) position of alaninol (range of Deltadelta13C approximately 50 per thousand). The average precision was SD(Deltadelta13C) < 0.20 per thousand for directly measured positions of alaninol and phenethylamine. The precision of indirectly measured positions was poorer (SD(Deltadelta13C) = 0.94 per thousand for alaninol, 6.54 per thousand for phenethylamine) due to propagation of errors. These data demonstrate that GC-Py-GCC-IRMS data can be used to extract high-precision isotope ratios from amino acids despite nonideal positional fidelity in fragments and that natural intramolecular variability in delta13C can be used to distinguish different sources of amino acids.
气相色谱燃烧-同位素比率质谱法(GCC-IRMS)的最新进展已使化合物特异性同位素分析成为常规方法,但关于位置特异性同位素分析的报道仍然很少。本文报道了在线气相色谱热解(Py)与GCC-IRMS联用,用于分别分离和同位素表征丙氨醇和苯乙胺,它们分别是丙氨酸和苯丙氨酸的类似物。理想情况下,热解碎片将源自母体分子内的独特位点,母体分子内每个位置的同位素比率可以直接测量或根据碎片同位素比率计算,而不会大幅降低分析精度。丙氨醇热解产生了几个碎片,其中CO和CH4用于同位素比率计算。同位素标记实验表明,CO完全源自C(1)位置,而丙氨醇的所有三个位置都对CH4有贡献(C(1)贡献29.0±0.3%,C(2)贡献3.6±0.2%,C(3)贡献66.9±1.1%)。我们证明了尽管CH4的位置保真度不理想,但仍可迭代使用质量平衡来计算所有位置的同位素比率。苯乙胺热解产生苯和甲苯碎片。苯完全源自C(环),甲苯由C(3)和C(环)按比例形成。相对分子内同位素比率(Δδ13C)可直接从碎片的δ13C计算得出,也可通过质量平衡间接计算得出。尽管C(3)同位素比率是根据苯和甲苯碎片计算得出的,但误差传播表明,由于C(3)对甲苯的贡献较小,最终测定精度有所下降。来自四个不同供应商的每种氨基酸样品显示出不同来源之间的自然变异性,尤其是在丙氨醇的C(1)位置(Δδ13C范围约为50‰)。对于丙氨醇和苯乙胺直接测量的位置,平均精度为SD(Δδ13C) < 0.20‰。由于误差传播,间接测量位置的精度较差(丙氨醇的SD(Δδ13C) = 0.94‰,苯乙胺的SD(Δδ13C) = 6.54‰)。这些数据表明,尽管碎片中的位置保真度不理想,但GC-Py-GCC-IRMS数据可用于从氨基酸中提取高精度同位素比率,并且δ13C的自然分子内变异性可用于区分不同来源的氨基酸。