Sacks Gavin L, Zhang Ying, Brenna J Thomas
Cornell University, Division of Nutritional Sciences, Savage Hall, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Anal Chem. 2007 Aug 15;79(16):6348-58. doi: 10.1021/ac0706325. Epub 2007 Jul 11.
We report here the first coupling of fast GC to IRMS, in a system capable of 250 ms peak widths (fwhm) at 1 mL/min flow rates, one-fifth as narrow as any previously reported GCC-IRMS system. We developed an optimized postcolumn interface that results in minimal peak broadening, using a programmable temperature vaporization injector in place of a rotary valve or backflush system to divert solvent, a narrow capillary combustion reactor followed by a cryogenic water trap with narrow-bore (<0.20 mm i.d.) transfer lines, and a narrow i.d. open split to the IRMS directly inserted into the column effluent. Quantitative combustion was demonstrated with CH4 injections. A comparison of CO2 injections with different fwhm peak widths (250, 2500, and 7500 ms) showed similar precisions, SD(delta13C)=0.2-0.3 per thousand, for injections of >600 pmol C on column; precision for the narrow peaks (250 ms) was considerably better for injections<150 pmol C on column. SD(delta13C)<1 per thousand was achievable for injections of 5-15 pmol on column for 250 ms wide peaks, 10-fold better precision than 2500 ms wide peaks, and within a factor of 3 of the counting statistics limit. For a mixture of 15 fatty acid methyl esters (FAME), 1.5 nmol C of each on column yielded typical SD(delta13Cpdb)=0.4 per thousand for fast GC and 0.5 per thousand for conventional GC. For 14 of the 15 FAME, delta13C values between the two systems were within+/-1.5 per thousand and not significantly different. Fast GCC-IRMS required one-third the run time (450 s vs 1400 s) to achieve comparable resolution. Mean peak widths for fast GCC-IRMS of the FAME were 720 ms, compared to 650 ms by fast GC with flame ionization detection. At a 15-fold dilution (100 pmol C on column for each FAME), fast GCC-IRMS achieved approximately 2-fold better precision and accuracy than similar injections on conventional GCC-IRMS. Finally, a mixture of 10 steroids (approximately 7 nmol C (100 ng) each on column) was analyzed with mean precision of SD(delta13C)=0.2 per thousand in 620 s by fast GCC-IRMS, while conventional GCC-IRMS required 1200 s and achieved poorer resolution. delta13C values for the two system were similar (Deltadelta13C<or=2 per thousand for all steroids), indicating that accuracy is not compromised. In summary, fast GCC-IRMS can achieve similar precision to conventional GC with considerable time savings for standard sample sizes (>1 nmol C) and achieves modest precision (approximately 1 per thousand) near the counting statistics limit on low level components.
我们在此报告快速气相色谱(GC)与同位素比率质谱仪(IRMS)的首次联用,该系统在1 mL/min流速下能够实现250 ms的峰宽(半高宽),仅为此前报道的任何气相色谱 - 同位素比率质谱仪(GCC - IRMS)系统峰宽的五分之一。我们开发了一种优化的柱后接口,可使峰展宽最小化,使用可编程温度汽化进样器替代旋转阀或反吹系统来转移溶剂,一个窄径毛细管燃烧反应器,随后是带有窄内径(<0.20 mm内径)传输线的低温水阱,以及直接插入柱流出物的窄内径开口分流器至IRMS。通过注入CH₄证明了定量燃烧。对不同半高宽峰宽(250、2500和7500 ms)的CO₂注入进行比较,结果表明,对于柱上注入>600 pmol C的情况,精度相似,SD(δ¹³C)= 0.2 - 0.3‰;对于柱上注入<150 pmol C的情况,窄峰(250 ms)的精度明显更好。对于250 ms宽峰,柱上注入5 - 15 pmol时,SD(δ¹³C)<1‰是可以实现的,精度比2500 ms宽峰好10倍,且在计数统计极限的3倍范围内。对于15种脂肪酸甲酯(FAME)的混合物,柱上每种1.5 nmol C,快速GC的典型SD(δ¹³Cpdb)= 0.4‰,传统GC为0.5‰。对于15种FAME中的14种,两个系统之间的δ¹³C值在±1.5‰以内,无显著差异。快速GCC - IRMS实现可比分辨率所需的运行时间仅为传统GC测定的三分之一(450 s对1400 s)。FAME的快速GCC - IRMS的平均峰宽为720 ms,而采用火焰离子化检测的快速GC为650 ms。在15倍稀释(每种FAME柱上为100 pmol C)时,快速GCC - IRMS比传统GCC - IRMS上的类似注入实现了约2倍的更好精度和准确性。最后,对10种类固醇混合物(柱上每种约7 nmol C(100 ng))进行分析,快速GCC - IRMS在620 s内的平均精度为SD(δ¹³C)= 0.2‰,而传统GCC - IRMS需要约1200 s且分辨率较差。两个系统的δ¹³C值相似(所有类固醇的Δδ¹³C≤2‰),表明准确性未受影响。总之,对于标准样品量(>1 nmol C),快速GCC - IRMS可实现与传统GC相似的精度且能大幅节省时间,对于低含量组分,在接近计数统计极限时可实现适度精度(约1‰)。