Hakala Tapio, Valtola Antti J M, Turpeinen Anu K, Hedman Antti E, Vuorenniemi Rauli E U, Karjalainen Jari M, Vajanto Ismo S, Kouri Juhani, Jaakkola Pekka A, Hartikainen Juha E K
Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 1777, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Europace. 2005 Mar;7(2):170-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.12.006.
The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to investigate the efficacy of atrial overdrive pacing (AOP) and bradycardia prevention pacing (BPP) in the prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG).
One hundred and twenty-four on-pump CABG patients were randomized into three groups: AOP, BPP, and NP (no pacing). AOP patients were paced via epicardial wires using an atrial preference pacing algorithm, and BPP patients were paced in the AAI mode with a base rate of 60/min. Patients were paced for 48 h starting on the first postoperative day. The endpoint of the study was the first onset of AF lasting longer than 5 min.
Preoperative risk factors and surgical data of patients did not differ between the AOP, BPP and NP groups. Pacing was technically successful in 80.5% of patients in the AOP and in 92.7% in the BPP groups. The incidence of AF in the AOP (26.8%), BPP (19.5%) and NP (28.6%) groups did not differ significantly. In the AOP group, AF in three patients was probably induced by inappropriate pacing due to sensing failure.
Atrial overdrive pacing and bradycardia prevention pacing were not effective in the prevention of AF after CABG.
本前瞻性随机研究旨在探讨心房超速起搏(AOP)和预防心动过缓起搏(BPP)在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后预防心房颤动(AF)中的疗效。
124例体外循环CABG患者被随机分为三组:AOP组、BPP组和NP组(无起搏)。AOP组患者通过心外膜导线采用心房优先起搏算法进行起搏,BPP组患者以AAI模式起搏,基础心率为60次/分钟。患者从术后第一天开始起搏48小时。研究终点为首次发作持续超过5分钟的房颤。
AOP组、BPP组和NP组患者的术前危险因素和手术数据无差异。AOP组80.5%的患者起搏技术成功,BPP组为92.7%。AOP组(26.8%)、BPP组(19.5%)和NP组(28.6%)的房颤发生率无显著差异。在AOP组中,三名患者的房颤可能是由于感知失败导致的不适当起搏引起的。
心房超速起搏和预防心动过缓起搏在预防CABG术后房颤方面无效。